Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Hellenistic and Roman grave steles in Asia Minor were usually produced and put in place for a unique, specific purpose and intended for eternal display at the tomb. We can see, however, that even long before the Late Antique period when the recycling of spolia became frequent, these grave steles were reused and repurposed as grave steles. The main procedure was to simply add a new inscription or to erase the old inscription in order to overwrite it with a new one; minor details of relief decoration might be changed or it even might be left as it was. In this article, I explore and describe this multifaceted phenomenon, which can be traced by examining the actual state of the monuments to detect the presence of one or more inscriptions, erasures and incongruities between pictures and text, as well as the chiselled-off or lowered parts and remodelled relief decorations. This contribution sets this phenomenon within a larger context between the two poles, one of which is the practical and economic object recycling, a familiar procedure that several materials underwent in antiquity, and the second of which is the predilection for antiquities and the re-use of old and valuable things in meaningful ways. The main procedures used to rework grave steles are illustrated by presenting some examples from across Anatolia; this selection remains, of course, far from exhaustive. If we consider the repurposing of funerary steles and other archaeological objects by applying the theoretical approaches of object biography and life cycle-management, i.e. taking into account all single phases of the use of a specific object, we will uncover new ways to understand those Anatolian grave steles hitherto believed anomalous. These approaches enable us to accept, handle, and integrate the different phases of perceiving and reconstructing ancient realities.
Hellenistic and Roman grave steles in Asia Minor were usually produced and put in place for a unique, specific purpose and intended for eternal display at the tomb. We can see, however, that even long before the Late Antique period when the recycling of spolia became frequent, these grave steles were reused and repurposed as grave steles. The main procedure was to simply add a new inscription or to erase the old inscription in order to overwrite it with a new one; minor details of relief decoration might be changed or it even might be left as it was. In this article, I explore and describe this multifaceted phenomenon, which can be traced by examining the actual state of the monuments to detect the presence of one or more inscriptions, erasures and incongruities between pictures and text, as well as the chiselled-off or lowered parts and remodelled relief decorations. This contribution sets this phenomenon within a larger context between the two poles, one of which is the practical and economic object recycling, a familiar procedure that several materials underwent in antiquity, and the second of which is the predilection for antiquities and the re-use of old and valuable things in meaningful ways. The main procedures used to rework grave steles are illustrated by presenting some examples from across Anatolia; this selection remains, of course, far from exhaustive. If we consider the repurposing of funerary steles and other archaeological objects by applying the theoretical approaches of object biography and life cycle-management, i.e. taking into account all single phases of the use of a specific object, we will uncover new ways to understand those Anatolian grave steles hitherto believed anomalous. These approaches enable us to accept, handle, and integrate the different phases of perceiving and reconstructing ancient realities.
ÖZ İnsanlık tarihinin belki de en önemli olgusu kişinin varlığı ve ölümüdür. İnsan, kaybedilenleri anma ve varlığının izlerini bu dünyada bırakma aracı olarak anıtlar inşa etmiştir. Anıt, tarihte yaşanmış büyük olayları, önemli kişilerin hatıralarını sonraki kuşaklara aktarmak için yapılmış olsa da, esas olarak insanın dünyada bir iz bırakma çabası olarak nitelendirilmektedir. Anıtlar, küçük bir mezar taşından, firavunların büyük ölçekli mezarlarına, dikili taşlardan, tarihteki önemli kişilerin kahramanlık hikayelerinin tasvir edildiği heykellere, insanın var olma, hatırlanma ve iz bırakma güdüsünü temsil etmesi gibi amaçlarla yapılmıştır. Anıtsallık kavramının kullanımı, mimaride, sanat tarihinde özellikle arkeoloji gibi birçok akademik disiplinde yaygın olarak bulunmakta; ancak arkeoloji literatüründe anıtsallığın tanımının tam olarak yapılmamış olması bu kavramın esasen mimarlık disiplini içerisinde değerlendirilmesine yol açmıştır. Bu nedenle çalışmamızda öncelikli olarak anıt/anıtsallık kavramı üzerinde durulmuş ve arkeolojide anıtsallığa yaklaşım irdelenmiştir. Çalışmamız içerisinde yer alan bir diğer bölümde ise; Karia Bölgesi sınırları içerisinde yer alan yerleşimlerdeki anıtsal mezar mimarisinin, MÖ 6.yy’dan başlayarak MS 2. yy’a kadar, gelişimi ortaya koyulmaya çalışılmıştır.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.