INTRODUCTIONOver the last 5 decades, the average engineering curriculum has largely been based on an "engineering science" model in which the analytical and mathematical elements of engineering are strictly of focus [1]. This implies that all challenges faced in engineering can be condensed and modeled as solvable math equations. This model, however, poses a threat to the current methods of engineering practice by giving the notion that all serious engineering is done in the language of mathematics [2]. While the engineering science model approach has a clear role in a design process, the model neglects to show that engineering also involves "working between technical and non-technical considerations … and managing trade-offs where solutions are judged by interdisciplinary criteria" [3]. Therefore, in instituting this model in engineering curricula, those factors that make engineering design as much of a social activity as a mathematical process are neglected [2]. Neglected factors include the "systems methodology" and "engineering design" related processes such as need identification, problem formulation, development of alternatives, and analysis and decision-making using prototypes and judgment. Also neglected are social aspects such as cultural and environmental influences and processes such as working with a group of individuals. All of these factors, plus many more, are what drive the demands of technology and product innovation today. These demands have evolved the current practice of engineering in such a way that there now exists disconnect between engineering education and engineering practice. This disconnect has resulted in today's engineering students lacking the key skills needed to be successful engineers [4] and resulted in many prominent calls to reduce the distance between engineering education and engineering practice. The most notable call is perhaps from the National Academy of Engineering's Engineer of 2020 project [5], [6] which calls for the inclusion of interdisciplinary knowledge and teamwork skills into engineering curricula. As a result, engineering education is starting to change.One major area of change in engineering education is in design. Although design is widely considered as the most distinguishing and fundamental activity of engineering [1], most curricula have it either isolated in the senior year or sometimes also in the first year. Now, as the engineering curriculum has progressed, first year design courses, known as the cornerstone engineering courses, and fourth year design courses, referred to as capstone courses, have seen increased development as well [1]. However, these capstone courses serve as the only standard opportunity across engineering education for undergraduate engineering students to showcase their engineering education. This traditional way of approaching engineering education does not compare to modern engineering practice in which interdisciplinary teamwork and design are centrally important. This disconnect between engineering education and The interdis...