2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-54623-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency and Certain Answers in Relational to RDF Data Exchange with Shape Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding transformations defined by schema mappings, if the mapping does not define target constraints, then the target schema is simply a relational signature and type checking is reduced to trivial syntactic check, and as such it is irrelevant. This is most often the case for graph schema mappings [7,13], with seldom exceptions such as [10] for mapping relational to graph-shaped data. Their notion of consistency is related to type checking, but is studied for a simpler formalism without path queries.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding transformations defined by schema mappings, if the mapping does not define target constraints, then the target schema is simply a relational signature and type checking is reduced to trivial syntactic check, and as such it is irrelevant. This is most often the case for graph schema mappings [7,13], with seldom exceptions such as [10] for mapping relational to graph-shaped data. Their notion of consistency is related to type checking, but is studied for a simpler formalism without path queries.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%