2021
DOI: 10.3390/children8020085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency of a Nonword Repetition Task to Discriminate Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder in Catalan–Spanish and European Portuguese Speaking Children

Abstract: Nonword repetition has been proposed as a diagnostic marker of developmental language disorder (DLD); however, the inconsistency in the ability of nonword repetition tasks (NRT) to identify children with DLD raises significant questions regarding its feasibility as a clinical tool. Research suggests that some of the inconsistency across NRT may be due to differences in the nature of the nonword stimuli. In this study, we compared children’s performance on NRT between two cohorts: the children in the Catalan–Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings, however, could not be replicated in another study, using exactly the same test, which identified only 3 of the 10 children with language disorder ( 104 ). The difference highlighted the large variability in the performance of non-word and sentence repetition even among children with language disorders, in addition to the inconsistent difference found between children with and without language disorder ( 149 ). Another plausible explanation for the relatively higher sensitivity of using child's actual language skills lies in the resemblance between the items used for screening based on the child's actual language and the diagnostic tests used as the reference standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings, however, could not be replicated in another study, using exactly the same test, which identified only 3 of the 10 children with language disorder ( 104 ). The difference highlighted the large variability in the performance of non-word and sentence repetition even among children with language disorders, in addition to the inconsistent difference found between children with and without language disorder ( 149 ). Another plausible explanation for the relatively higher sensitivity of using child's actual language skills lies in the resemblance between the items used for screening based on the child's actual language and the diagnostic tests used as the reference standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another plausible explanation for the relatively higher sensitivity of using child's actual language skills lies in the resemblance between the items used for screening based on the child's actual language and the diagnostic tests used as the reference standard. Differences in task design and test item selection across studies may have further increased the inconsistencies ( 149 ). Therefore, in future tool development or refinement, great care should be taken in the choice of screening proxy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonword repetition task proved a robust measure of phonology, which may reflect the fact that it was originally designed to mirror the demands of learning new words (Gathercole, 2006). Indeed, in the developmental language disorder (DLD) literature, nonword repetition is now used as a diagnostic marker of DLD for both monolingual and multilingual children (Ahufinger et al, 2021). Our experimental NWR task also enabled us to score toddlers' phonological development in terms of different levels of phonology such as primary syllable stress, syllable and consonant phoneme accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this hypothesis that children with DLD exhibit a limited cognitive load, and thus that language processing can easily overload their cognitive systems, non-word repetition has been proposed as a measure of the phonological working memory capacity and a marker of DLD [15,16]. In this sense, the work of Ahufinger et al [17] explored the consistency of a non-word repetition task of 3-, 4-, 5-and 6-syllables presented in a random order and with varied wordlikeness ratings. Their results showed that the task discriminated correctly children with and without DLD (from 5 years and 16 years) speaking Catalan-Spanish (bilinguals) and European Portuguese (monolinguals).…”
Section: Developmental Language Disorders (Dld)mentioning
confidence: 99%