2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consolidation and deformation around stone columns: Comparison of theoretical and laboratory results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structures are subjected to excessive settlement, leading to stability issues, due to very low strength and high compressibility of soft clay. Granular piles (also known as stone columns) are constructed in soft clays by partial replacement of unsuitable native soil with dense and highly permeable granular material to improve the bearing capacity, to reduce settlements and to increase the rate of consolidation [1][2][3]. Under compressive load, granular piles fail in bulging, sliding and general shear [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structures are subjected to excessive settlement, leading to stability issues, due to very low strength and high compressibility of soft clay. Granular piles (also known as stone columns) are constructed in soft clays by partial replacement of unsuitable native soil with dense and highly permeable granular material to improve the bearing capacity, to reduce settlements and to increase the rate of consolidation [1][2][3]. Under compressive load, granular piles fail in bulging, sliding and general shear [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Young’s modulus of the columns is usually between 25 and 100 MPa ( Table 3 ) and it also varies with the confining pressure. A hyperbolic power law is sometimes used to reproduce the stress dependent stiffness of the gravel of the columns (e.g., [ 58 , 95 , 96 ]). The common value of the exponent of the power law is around 0.3 ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Properties Of the Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to the analytical studies, Pulko et al [6] developed a design procedure based on analytical closed-form solution for non-encased and encased stone columns, taking into account the encasement stiffness, column arrangements and load levels. Castro et al [7] compared the stress distribution and the settlement reduction of end-bearing columns from analytical solutions with those from Abstract: Soft cohesive soils containing much silt or clay content with low bearing capacity are not suitable for deep vibratory compaction. To improve the bearing behavior of these types of soils to withstand against heavy building loads, the surrounding soil mass must be reinforced with any stiff physical or chemical admixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%