2018
DOI: 10.30880/ijie.2018.10.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machinery/Service system Scheduled Replacement time determination: A combine Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment, Additive Ratio Assessment and Age Replacement Model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies of the ARAS methods, to handle the complex decision-making problems more comprehensively, there are some researchers that combine the ARAS method with other kinds of decision-making methods to rank the alternatives**. These studies can be segmented to two categories, that is, the parallel combination-based studies, 23,27,37,41,44,50,[54][55][56]63,67,[72][73][74][75]83,86,96,97,99,[122][123][124][125][126][127] and the subsequent combinationbased studies. 46 For the studies belonging to the first category, the methods and the ARAS method derive rankings separately, and then researchers generally analyze the different rankings or aggregate the rankings into one final ranking.…”
Section: The Combination With Other Decision-making Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the studies of the ARAS methods, to handle the complex decision-making problems more comprehensively, there are some researchers that combine the ARAS method with other kinds of decision-making methods to rank the alternatives**. These studies can be segmented to two categories, that is, the parallel combination-based studies, 23,27,37,41,44,50,[54][55][56]63,67,[72][73][74][75]83,86,96,97,99,[122][123][124][125][126][127] and the subsequent combinationbased studies. 46 For the studies belonging to the first category, the methods and the ARAS method derive rankings separately, and then researchers generally analyze the different rankings or aggregate the rankings into one final ranking.…”
Section: The Combination With Other Decision-making Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the parallel combination-based studies, some of them mainly started from the perspective of overviewing to analyze the features of different methods, 125 some combined different methods to decide the final ranking and analyzed the results derived from the different methods, 27,37,44,50,55,63,[72][73][74]86,96,97,99,[122][123][124]127 and the other had the specific procedure to aggregate the results derived from the different methods. 23,41,54,56,67,75,83 As Figure 10 shows, the analyses for the rankings derived from different methods mainly start from the following two perspectives: (1) correlation index, which mainly analyzes the correlation between the rankings.…”
Section: The Parallel Combination-based Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have pointed out the drawbacks of the risk priority number (RPN) as they established that RPN is not able to depict exactly the severity of some failure modes especially when certain factors such as economic cost and environmental impact are involved in the risk analysis [30]. Consequently, some other authors integrated the weighted aggregated product assessment (WASPAS) into RCM as an alternative for prioritizing the use of the RPN [31]. The technique was said to improve the effectiveness of RCM as well as in the selection of an optimal maintenance strategy for some industrial applications [32].…”
Section: Other Logical Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more simplified models of stone column treatments, such as gravel trenches or soil homogenization, calibrating or tuning model parameters using the unit cell as an auxiliary problem was recommended. Kardgar [23] and Das and Dey [24] analyzed the bearing capacity of a crushed stone pile foundation using a finite element analysis. Kardgar [23] found that even though a wider foundation, larger stone column diameter, and larger quantity of stone columns corresponded to an increase in the bearing capacity of the foundation, the effect of stone column length and encasement stiffness was more pronounced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kardgar [23] and Das and Dey [24] analyzed the bearing capacity of a crushed stone pile foundation using a finite element analysis. Kardgar [23] found that even though a wider foundation, larger stone column diameter, and larger quantity of stone columns corresponded to an increase in the bearing capacity of the foundation, the effect of stone column length and encasement stiffness was more pronounced. As such, these parameters can be considered critical factors in the analysis of shallow foundations in reinforced soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%