2016
DOI: 10.1177/0263276416657880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspiracy Theory: Truth Claim or Language Game?

Abstract: The paper is a contribution to current debates about conspiracy theories within philosophy and cultural studies. Wittgenstein’s understanding of language is invoked to analyse the epistemological effects of designating particular questions and explanations as a ‘conspiracy theory’. It is demonstrated how such a designation relegates these questions and explanations beyond the realm of meaningful discourse. In addition, Agamben’s concept of sovereignty is applied to explore the political effects of using the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some people are clearly repulsed by these terms, while others are attracted to them (see Wood, ). Nonetheless, conspiracy theories are a controversial subject (Bjerg & Presskorn‐Thygesen, ; Smallpage, ) which can arouse passions both in and out of academia (Cullen, ; Lewandowsky, ).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some people are clearly repulsed by these terms, while others are attracted to them (see Wood, ). Nonetheless, conspiracy theories are a controversial subject (Bjerg & Presskorn‐Thygesen, ; Smallpage, ) which can arouse passions both in and out of academia (Cullen, ; Lewandowsky, ).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three labels -pseudoscience, denier and conspiracy theory -are derogatory, at least when applied by supporters of orthodoxy [Bjerg and Presskorn-Thygesen, 2016]. Labelling using these terms is both a method of boundary work and a method of denigration.…”
Section: Wikipediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to rule conspiratorial intentions or events out from the situation in principle. It is only to separate its hypothetical explanations from the actual processes of governmentality that this paper has analyzed (see Bjerg and Presskorn-Thygesen 2017).…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%