Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing - STOC '03 2003
DOI: 10.1145/780555.780557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant factor approximation of vertex-cuts in planar graphs

Abstract: We devise the first constant factor approximation algorithm for minimum quotient vertex-cuts in planar graphs. Our algorithm achieves approximation ratio 1+ (1 + + o(1)) if there is an optimal quotient vertex-cut (A * , B * , C * ) where the weight of C * is of low order compared to those of A * and B * ; this holds, for example, when the input graph has uniform weights and costs. The ratio further im-W . We use our algorithm for quotient vertex-cuts to achieve the first constant-factor pseudo-approximation fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result on the flow-cut gap in node capacitated planar graphs gives an alternate O(1) approximation, albeit with a much larger constant, for the minimum quotient node cut problem in planar graphs [3]. Although our proof is similar in outline to that for the edge capacitated problem that we presented in [9], there is a crucial technical difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our result on the flow-cut gap in node capacitated planar graphs gives an alternate O(1) approximation, albeit with a much larger constant, for the minimum quotient node cut problem in planar graphs [3]. Although our proof is similar in outline to that for the edge capacitated problem that we presented in [9], there is a crucial technical difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, in the node capacitated case, there is no such reduction which preserves planarity. This was the technical difficulty in generalizing the O(1) gap proof of Klein, Plotkin and Rao [21] to the node problem (see [3] for some additional discussion). Thus we need to work directly with node capacities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations