Constitutional Principles Of Judiciary: Peculiarities Of Formalization In The Cis Countries

Abstract

The modern principles of judiciary, being an integrative constitutional-theoretical category, are the object of scientific research from the point of view of a meaningful interpretation, as well as the specific nature of formalization, including its the comparative legal aspect. In this regard, the research subject of this article is represented by the norms of the constitutions of the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The article presents the analysis results, which allowed us identifying the non-standard approaches to consolidate the constitutional principles of the judiciary in the focus group of acts. We associate these approaches with the compositional specific nature of principle reflection, as well as with the variably-substantive aspect, which quantitatively and qualitatively supplements the standard list of required fundamental ideas.

Constitutional and Legal Regulation of State Authority Interaction on Citizen Appeals: Foreign Experience

“…Appeals of citizens, being a subjective constitutional law (Bruegel 1953;Gregory 1998;Plasser et al 2016;Zhadan 2018) a form of participation in state affair management, a method of violated right protection (Bricker 2017;Kelemen 2017;Mancini 2018;Treskov et al 2020), a source of information about their attitude to the functioning of public structures and the degree of trust in them, affect the nature of state body interaction (Weisman 1994;Slaughter 1995;Gaeva 2016). Moreover, the features of a public addressee along with an appleaing content affect the form of the latter (Habermas 2008;Makogon et al 2019).…”