2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-017-1319-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained dynamic multi-objective evolutionary optimization for operational indices of beneficiation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach employs specific non-linear models using polynomials up to an order of two and restricts the synchronous optimization to at most two quality targets (responses), thus to two objectives (achieved by the reformulation of the problem with an additional constraint on the second objective). Similar considerations (two objectives restriction) go to the approach in [58], which employs RBF neural networks as surrogate models, but no explicit DoE is described there. The approach in [21] performs a plain orthogonal experimental design to generate an initial data set for model training and achieves single-objective (i.e., lens thickness) process optimization through reinforcement learning techniques, which require permanent user/operator feedback during the on-line process (which is not available/applicable in our use case).…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach employs specific non-linear models using polynomials up to an order of two and restricts the synchronous optimization to at most two quality targets (responses), thus to two objectives (achieved by the reformulation of the problem with an additional constraint on the second objective). Similar considerations (two objectives restriction) go to the approach in [58], which employs RBF neural networks as surrogate models, but no explicit DoE is described there. The approach in [21] performs a plain orthogonal experimental design to generate an initial data set for model training and achieves single-objective (i.e., lens thickness) process optimization through reinforcement learning techniques, which require permanent user/operator feedback during the on-line process (which is not available/applicable in our use case).…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers have studied the optimization of the production process of metal mines in terms of three major aspects. The first is the optimization of metal mine production in the beneficiation process [7][8][9][10][11]. Obviously, the local optimization of a unit process does not guarantee the global optimization of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of the metal mines production process is an effective way to raise the economic benefits of enterprises and contribute to the sustainable development of resources.In recent years, researchers have studied the optimization of the production process of metal mines in terms of three major aspects. The first is the optimization of metal mine production in the beneficiation process [7][8][9][10][11]. Obviously, the local optimization of a unit process does not guarantee the global optimization of the process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%