2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained interactivity for relating multiple representations in science: When virtual is better than real

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the pre-test result in Figure 1, the students' right answer in this indicator is still around < 30%. It is also relatable with the (Barrett et al, 2015) findings that found that the students commonly have difficulties in visualizing molecular geometries from the chemical formula. It causes them only to visualize it based on their assumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the pre-test result in Figure 1, the students' right answer in this indicator is still around < 30%. It is also relatable with the (Barrett et al, 2015) findings that found that the students commonly have difficulties in visualizing molecular geometries from the chemical formula. It causes them only to visualize it based on their assumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the task of matching the orientation and conformation (i.e. local configuration) of molecular diagrams and models because this is an important and common exercise to teach the correspondence between diverse representations in chemistry (Barrett, Stull, Hsu, Hegarty, 2015;Stull, Hegarty, Dixon, & Stieff, 2012;Wu & Shah, 2004). The findings of this work inform the specific design of cognitively supportive virtual models for chemistry education and also reveal more general design implications for virtual interactions in other disciplines that rely on spatial representations.…”
Section: Organic Chemistry As a Test Bedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VR has been used with positive results in a variety of disciplines such as engineering and architecture (Burnley, 2007;Doyle, Dodge, & Smith, 1998;Izard & Méndez, 2016). Reports indicate that training/teaching in VR is at least as effective as real-world training (Barrett, Stull, Hsu, & Hegarty, 2015;Harrington et al, 2017;Khanal et al, 2014;Stone, Watts, Zhong, & Wei, 2011) with the advantages that it is safer to make mistakes (Johnson, Levine, Smith, & Stone, 2010;Lorenzo, 2014), students find it engaging (Harrington et al, 2017;Lee, Sergueeva, Catangui, & Kandaurova, 2017), motivating (Fonseca & Redondo, 2013;Redondo et al, 2014) and it can provide greater information uptake through the provision of multiple learning resources in the spherical environment (Harrington et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%