2013
DOI: 10.1144/sp386.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining depositional models in the Barents Sea region using detrital zircon U–Pb data from Mesozoic sediments in Svalbard

Abstract: Detrital zircon U–Pb laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry age data on sandstones from Mesozoic successions on Svalbard are used to investigate provenance changes over time, constrain potential source areas, and to test and refine previous interpretations of the Mesozoic filling of the Barents Sea. The zircon age data indicate a western Laurentian (North Greenland) source in the Early and Middle Triassic. The westerly derived sediments most likely include reworked older sediments with pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have not identified an obvious source in the Arctic, but these ages are also found in modern sands of the Ob and Yenisey Rivers of western Siberia (Safonova et al, 2010). The next peak is centered at 1153 Ma, and, although small (5% of the distribution), it is important because zircons of this age are common in the Grenville orogen of Laurentia and Baltica (Rainbird et al, 1992;Mosher, 1998;Tollo et al, 2004;Li et al, 2007;Gasser and Andresen, 2013;Pózer Bue and Andresen, 2013), Severnaya Zemlya (Lorenz et al, 2008), and Novaya Zemlya (Lorenz et al, 2013) but are rare in Siberia and are absent from our Late Jurassic samples from the South Anyui suture zone (Fig. 15).…”
Section: Chukotka Triassic Passive-margin Stratamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We have not identified an obvious source in the Arctic, but these ages are also found in modern sands of the Ob and Yenisey Rivers of western Siberia (Safonova et al, 2010). The next peak is centered at 1153 Ma, and, although small (5% of the distribution), it is important because zircons of this age are common in the Grenville orogen of Laurentia and Baltica (Rainbird et al, 1992;Mosher, 1998;Tollo et al, 2004;Li et al, 2007;Gasser and Andresen, 2013;Pózer Bue and Andresen, 2013), Severnaya Zemlya (Lorenz et al, 2008), and Novaya Zemlya (Lorenz et al, 2013) but are rare in Siberia and are absent from our Late Jurassic samples from the South Anyui suture zone (Fig. 15).…”
Section: Chukotka Triassic Passive-margin Stratamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Overall, the southern Barents Sea Basin subsided through the remainder of the Triassic and was infilled by several kilometers of sediment of the Klappmyss, Kobbe, and Snadd Formations, mainly derived from the Uralian orogen and Kara Sea (Fig. 3;Glørstad-Clark et al, 2010;Henriksen et al, 2011a;Pózer Bue and Andresen, 2014;Klausen et al, 2015). After the arrival of the easterly derived Uralian system on the Finnmark Platform, the southerly system cannot be identified in seismic data.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Late Permian‐Early Triassic rifting is controversially discussed in the western Barents Sea. While some authors claim that the Triassic was a tectonically quiet period, particularly in the northern Barents Sea and Svalbard region (Gabrielsen et al, ; Høy & Lundschien, ; Klausen, ; Pózer Bue & Andresen, ; Riis et al, ; Worsley, ), there is evidence for extensional deformation on Svalbard, in the Bjørnøya Basin, and the Fingerdjupet Subbasin (Anell et al, ; Blaich et al, ; Osmundsen et al, ; Serck et al, ). Renewed tectonic activity was apparent toward the middle Jurassic in both the North Atlantic and the Arctic regions, continuing into earliest Cretaceous time involving multiple phases of extension and magmatism (Blaich et al, ; Clark et al, ; Corfu et al, ; Faleide et al, , ; Maher, ; Polteau et al, ; Serck et al, ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%