2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the age of the last geomagnetic reversal from geochemical and magnetic analyses of Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Ocean sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
19
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The tektite event is said to occur at the beginning of interglacial period M19, i.e., at a time a paleosol was developing. This is not in agreement with the most recent work of Valet et al (2019) on Indian Ocean deepsea cores that clearly put the tektite event at the very end of glacial period M20 or at the beginning of the transition to M19; i.e., at a time paleosol was not yet forming. It is unwise to use Chinese loess stratigraphy for precise chronology, as done by Mizera, as loess sequences do not follow a simple sedimentation pattern: paleosol may develop on materials that were deposited during a cold period due to down-going pedogenesis (see, e.g., Zhou and Shackleton, 1999).…”
contrasting
confidence: 97%
“…(1) The tektite event is said to occur at the beginning of interglacial period M19, i.e., at a time a paleosol was developing. This is not in agreement with the most recent work of Valet et al (2019) on Indian Ocean deepsea cores that clearly put the tektite event at the very end of glacial period M20 or at the beginning of the transition to M19; i.e., at a time paleosol was not yet forming. It is unwise to use Chinese loess stratigraphy for precise chronology, as done by Mizera, as loess sequences do not follow a simple sedimentation pattern: paleosol may develop on materials that were deposited during a cold period due to down-going pedogenesis (see, e.g., Zhou and Shackleton, 1999).…”
contrasting
confidence: 97%
“…7h). Considering the recently determined Be-proxy age constraints on the M-B boundary (~ 772 ka at midreversal: Simon et al 2018 andValet et al 2019), the age delay of ~ 22 ka may indicate lock-in depths of ~ 8 cm below the mixing layer for the M-B boundary in the studied core.…”
Section: Age Controlmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The two polarity changes at ~ 578 cm and ~ 677 cm in NPGP1401-2A provide an age framework as the M-B boundary of ~ 785-772 ka (e.g., Channell et al 2010;Sagnotti et al 2016;Mark et al 2017;Valet et al 2019) and the upper Jaramillo boundary of ~ 991-990 ka (Gradstein et al 2012;Simon et al 2018), respectively. In a sequence with such a low sedimentation rate (~ 677/990 cm/ka), surficial mixing and post-depositional remanent magnetization (pDRM) lock-in effects could affect the paleomagnetic age delay (e.g., Suganuma et al 2010;Simon et al 2016Simon et al , 2018.…”
Section: Age Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…773 ka (with a duration of 4.4 ka) from a set of highresolution paleomagnetic and oxygen isotope data from marine sites in the northern Atlantic Ocean (Channell et al, 2010), and at ca. 772 ka from a combination of 10 Be, paleomagnetic and oxygen isotope analyses (Valet et al, 2019). The volcanic records are characterized by more scattered ages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent discrepancies between the ages derived from marine records and from terrestrial lava sequences could be caused by multiple factors: (1) non-dipole structures recorded by lava flows but smoothed out in sediments; (2) potential offset between the two signals due to delayed magnetization resulting from locking depth in some sediments; and (3) uncertainties inherent to radiometric dating (Channell et al, 2010;Singer, 2014) and orbital tuning techniques (Valet et al, 2019). It has been proposed (Valet et al, 2012) that geomagnetic reversals could be described by three successive phases: a precursory event, a 180 • polarity switch and a rebound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%