1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(97)00157-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the full stress tensor from observations of drilling-induced tensile fractures and leak-off tests: Application to borehole stability and sand production on the Norwegian margin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since deviated boreholes typically sample the stress tensor at a variety of relative orientations, the onset and relative position of borehole failure as a function of deviation could potentially provide constraints on stress magnitudes. The underlying assumption of such an approach is that the remote orientations and ratios among the principal stresses are constant throughout the sampled volume [ Wiprut et al ., ]. Similarly, information from several nearby inclined wells can be combined to constrain stress magnitudes, assuming that all wells considered are subjected to the same stress field [ Aadnoy , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since deviated boreholes typically sample the stress tensor at a variety of relative orientations, the onset and relative position of borehole failure as a function of deviation could potentially provide constraints on stress magnitudes. The underlying assumption of such an approach is that the remote orientations and ratios among the principal stresses are constant throughout the sampled volume [ Wiprut et al ., ]. Similarly, information from several nearby inclined wells can be combined to constrain stress magnitudes, assuming that all wells considered are subjected to the same stress field [ Aadnoy , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there are no publicly available measurements of rock strength within the Taranaki Basin, values for tensile rock strength were used from Chen et al, (1998) as they represented measurements from the same lithologies as those in the Kupe wells where tensile failure occurred. Tensile strength values used were low (ranging from 0.7-1.59 psi) and a zero tensile strength for reservoir rocks was also used, as is it is often assumed reservoir rocks have zero tensile strength when calculating S Hmax (e.g., (Wiprut et al, 1997a;Wiprut et al, 1997b;Barton et al, 1998;Brudy & Kjorholt, 2001;. Results showed little variation (~0.5 MPa) in S Hmax calculated from the tensile strengths of Chen et al, (1998) and a zero tensile strength.…”
Section: S Hmax Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%