2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-022-01329-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the increased frequency of global precipitation extremes under warming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 to the target of global precipitation change. In contrast to other important climate variables, most prominently future warming 35,[55][56][57] , emergent constraints 58 for global precipitation changes have only recently been suggested 59,60 . Here, our main aim was to reduce the influence of models which simulate variables considered important for the representation of precipitation very different from observations rather than applying a constraint that necessarily reduces model spread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 to the target of global precipitation change. In contrast to other important climate variables, most prominently future warming 35,[55][56][57] , emergent constraints 58 for global precipitation changes have only recently been suggested 59,60 . Here, our main aim was to reduce the influence of models which simulate variables considered important for the representation of precipitation very different from observations rather than applying a constraint that necessarily reduces model spread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, between 0 • and 10 • N, the annual regime will change into the biannual regime. It should be noted that the number of models in figure 4 is just about three out of the seven selected models, as CMIP6 projections of changing seasonal regimes vary widely across climate models [60].…”
Section: Projected Changes In Wet and Dry Seasons In The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw 5%-95% uncertainty ranges of future climate changes and impacts are estimated by assuming Gaussian distributions of the ESM spreads. We compute their observationally constrained ranges by applying the hierarchical ECs framework (Bowman et al 2018), as in Shiogama et al (2022) and Thackeray et al (2022). Here, z and x are the future climate changes/impacts and trT gm of ESMs, respectively.…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertainty Rangesmentioning
confidence: 99%