2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the links between the Himalayan belt and the Central Myanmar Basins during the Cenozoic: An integrated multi-proxy detrital geochronology and trace-element geochemistry study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, we propose that the exhuming northernmost perpetuation of the WPA, forming a segment of the Trans-Tethyan Arc in the Greater Burma region, should have significantly contributed to the late Eocene sediment supply of central Myanmar alongside the Wuntho Ranges (Figure 11a). Similarly, pre-Cretaceous zircons in the Yaw Formation could have been supplied by exhuming basement rocks in the Greater Burma region to the north, because the Eocene Phokphur conglomerates in the northern IBR (Aitchison et al, 2019;Cai et al, 2019) and Eocene sediments in the northernmost Chindwin Basin (Arboit et al, 2020) have comparable pre-Cretaceous age peaks as the Yaw Formation suggesting similar sourcing (Figure 8). Yaw Formation sourcing from north of the BT could have occurred in the Burmese backarc where sparse paleocurrent measurements suggest southward directed drainage systems since the late Eocene (Figure 11a; Thein & Maung, 2017).…”
Section: Sedimentary Provenance 531 Yaw Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, we propose that the exhuming northernmost perpetuation of the WPA, forming a segment of the Trans-Tethyan Arc in the Greater Burma region, should have significantly contributed to the late Eocene sediment supply of central Myanmar alongside the Wuntho Ranges (Figure 11a). Similarly, pre-Cretaceous zircons in the Yaw Formation could have been supplied by exhuming basement rocks in the Greater Burma region to the north, because the Eocene Phokphur conglomerates in the northern IBR (Aitchison et al, 2019;Cai et al, 2019) and Eocene sediments in the northernmost Chindwin Basin (Arboit et al, 2020) have comparable pre-Cretaceous age peaks as the Yaw Formation suggesting similar sourcing (Figure 8). Yaw Formation sourcing from north of the BT could have occurred in the Burmese backarc where sparse paleocurrent measurements suggest southward directed drainage systems since the late Eocene (Figure 11a; Thein & Maung, 2017).…”
Section: Sedimentary Provenance 531 Yaw Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2013, 2018), Arboit et al. (2021), Bender (1983), Htut (2017), and Zhang et al. (2021) and References therein.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hf‐isotope characterization of these Mesozoic‐Cenozoic grains allows for discrimination between zircons from the WPA, which have positive εHf values, as opposed to grains of similar age from the MMB, which have negative values (Wang et al., 2014). Other techniques have included rutile U‐Pb analyses, with Cenozoic grains interpreted as derived from the MMB (Zhang et al., 2021), and rutile geochemistry to assess metamorphic grade (Arboit et al., 2021). Arboit et al.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations