2010
DOI: 10.1162/comj.2010.34.2.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint Application with Higher-Order Programming for Modeling Music Theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the HMM of Allan (2002), which consists of probability distributions learned from a training set of chorale harmonizations, CHORAL is based on the programmer's hand-coded rules. While use of hand-coded rules persists (Phon-Amnuaisuk et al, 2006;Anders & Miranda, 2010), we suggest that reliance on music theorists' observations is not ideal, because the quality and quantity of observations varies across composers and periods. With Markov-type models, however, the same training process has the potential to generalize to music databases from different composers/periods.…”
Section: Existing Algorithms For Stylistic Compositionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the HMM of Allan (2002), which consists of probability distributions learned from a training set of chorale harmonizations, CHORAL is based on the programmer's hand-coded rules. While use of hand-coded rules persists (Phon-Amnuaisuk et al, 2006;Anders & Miranda, 2010), we suggest that reliance on music theorists' observations is not ideal, because the quality and quantity of observations varies across composers and periods. With Markov-type models, however, the same training process has the potential to generalize to music databases from different composers/periods.…”
Section: Existing Algorithms For Stylistic Compositionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The use of hand-coded rules (or constraints) to guide the generation of a passage of music was mentioned in Section 2.1 (Ebciǒglu, 1994;Phon-Amnuaisuk et al, 2006;Anders & Miranda, 2010;Elowsson & Friberg, 2012). We questioned whether such systems alone are viable beyond relatively restricted tasks in stylistic composition.…”
Section: Computational Models Of Musical Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted a computational paradigm referred to as constraint satisfaction problem to implement a generative music system that generates sequences of chord progressions in real-time Miranda 2011, Anders andMiranda 2010). The input to the system is a stream of pairs of hypothetic brain data, which controls higher-level aspects of chord progressions.…”
Section: Towards a Bcmi For Controlling Tonalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one hand, with the generality of using arbitrary control structures proposed by BackTalk on the other hand. Strasheela advocates constraint applicators based on higherorder programming [Anders and Miranda 2011]. A constraint is a procedure and a constraint applicator is a higher-order procedure expecting a music representation and a constraint as arguments.…”
Section: Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%