2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint preconditioners for solving singular saddle point problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume that the conditions of Lemma 3.1 are satisfied, then G is positive definite. From Lemma 2.4 and Theorem 2.9 in [32] we immediately have the following result. …”
Section: Convergence Analysis Of the Pss-based Constraint Preconditiomentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assume that the conditions of Lemma 3.1 are satisfied, then G is positive definite. From Lemma 2.4 and Theorem 2.9 in [32] we immediately have the following result. …”
Section: Convergence Analysis Of the Pss-based Constraint Preconditiomentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For this case, there are also many efficient methods, for which we refer to, e.g., [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Recently, Yang et al in [33] proposed a singular constraint preconditioner P and the corresponding preconditioned iteration method, where (1.2) and the preconditioned iteration method is described as follows: (k) ), k = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We call (1.1) the singular saddle-point problem. A number of effective methods have been proposed in the literature to solve the singular saddle-point problems, such as the Uzawa-type methods [8][9][10][11], Krylov subspace methods [12,13] and matrix splitting iteration methods [14][15][16][17][18] Based on the above splitting, Bai et al [19] proposed an HSS iteration method for solving non-Hermitian positive definite system of linear equations. The iteration scheme of the HSS method used for solving Au ¼ q can be written as ðaI þ HÞu ðkþ1=2Þ ¼ ðaI À SÞu ðkÞ þ q; ðaI þ SÞu ðkþ1Þ ¼ ðaI À HÞu ðkþ1=2Þ þ q; where a is a positive iteration parameter and TðaÞ ¼ ðaI þ SÞ À1 ðaI À HÞðaI þ HÞ À1 ðaI À SÞ ¼ ðaI þ SÞ À1 ðaI þ HÞ À1 ðaI À HÞðaI À SÞ;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call (1.1) the singular saddle point problem. A number of effective methods have been proposed in the literature to solve the singular saddle point problems, such as the Uzawa-type methods [22,32,35], Krylov subspace methods [26,33] and matrix splitting iteration methods [13,14,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%