2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on mantle viscosity and Laurentide ice sheet evolution from pluvial paleolake shorelines in the western United States

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of great importance that seismic tomography be used in combination with flexural studies to understand the structure of continental lithosphere, because estimates of T e that are consistent with the thickness of the mechanically competent upper crust cannot be used independently to discriminate between a jelly sandwich and a crème brûlée configuration (Burov, 2015). For example, seismic tomography indicates that old, cold, and thick mantle lithosphere does not exist at Lake Bonneville (Austermann et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2013). We propose that the presence of a weak lower crust could be partially responsible for the low inferred values of T e at coronae (Russell & Johnson, 2021) despite the stagnant‐lid convection style of Venus, but future missions will be required to test this hypothesis using seismic tomography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of great importance that seismic tomography be used in combination with flexural studies to understand the structure of continental lithosphere, because estimates of T e that are consistent with the thickness of the mechanically competent upper crust cannot be used independently to discriminate between a jelly sandwich and a crème brûlée configuration (Burov, 2015). For example, seismic tomography indicates that old, cold, and thick mantle lithosphere does not exist at Lake Bonneville (Austermann et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2013). We propose that the presence of a weak lower crust could be partially responsible for the low inferred values of T e at coronae (Russell & Johnson, 2021) despite the stagnant‐lid convection style of Venus, but future missions will be required to test this hypothesis using seismic tomography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viscoelastic relaxation of 2–3 mm/yr from two normal fault earthquakes ( M w 7.3, 6.8) were observed using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (Gourmelen & Amelung, 2005). Separating lake rebound uplift from post‐seismic signal will be particularly useful in providing additional constraints for upper mantle viscosity and shape of Laurentide ice sheet in the WUSA, as demonstrated recently by Austermann et al (2020) for example.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If the full‐spectrum model is incomplete, these kinds of nonlinear effects may be implicated. For example, the variations in plate thickness needed to fit the long‐term isostatic response to Lake Bonneville (Austermann et al, 2020) discussed in section 1 appear to be larger than the 30% reduction in plate thickness from the seismic to convection timescale. This difference could be due to an incompleteness in the full‐spectrum mechanical model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, LAB depths across western North America from lake rebound processes (acting on timescales 100 yr) suggest a thin, high viscosity lid of 15–25 km within the vicinity of Lake Bonneville (Austermann et al, 2020) in contrast to the seismically inferred thickness of 80 km (Hopper & Fischer, 2018). In the colder, tectonically stable eastern part of North America, modeling glacial rebound induced by the melting of the Laurentide ice sheet from the last glacial maximum (25,000 yr BP) to present day using a lithosphere with a thickness of 100 km reproduces uplift rates across the Hudson Bay region (e.g., Lau et al, 2016), whereas seismically derived estimates suggest a LAB depth of >200 km across the same region (e.g., Conrad & Lithgow‐Bertelloni, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%