1989
DOI: 10.1029/jb094ib04p04205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the abundance of eclogite in the upper mantle

Abstract: Examination of heavy mineral concentrates from several well‐known eclogite‐dominated kimberlites (Roberts Victor, Bobbejaan, Zagadochnaya) has revealed that the upper mantle sampled by these kimberlites was dominantly peridotite, with only a small amount of eclogite (3–15% by volume). In the case of Group II (micaceous) kimberlites in southern Africa (e.g., Roberts Victor), it is proposed that garnet peridotites were metasomatized (phlogopitized) within the upper mantle prior to xenolith incorporation. This ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding strengthens the possibility that the cratonic lithosphere formed initially in subduction-zone settings whose demise led to accretion of the arc crust and thickening of refractory mantle to create a stable, thick, continental lithosphere (Carlson et al 2000;Grove et al 2000). The paucity of eclogite xenoliths (<1% (Schulze 1989) indicates that essentially all of the descending oceanic plates during Archaean time were subducted into the deeper mantle, with little eclogitic material incorporated into the cratonic root.…”
Section: Primary Results From Geochemistry and Petrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding strengthens the possibility that the cratonic lithosphere formed initially in subduction-zone settings whose demise led to accretion of the arc crust and thickening of refractory mantle to create a stable, thick, continental lithosphere (Carlson et al 2000;Grove et al 2000). The paucity of eclogite xenoliths (<1% (Schulze 1989) indicates that essentially all of the descending oceanic plates during Archaean time were subducted into the deeper mantle, with little eclogitic material incorporated into the cratonic root.…”
Section: Primary Results From Geochemistry and Petrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jordan showed, for example, that fertile cratonic samples contain significant weight percentages of both clinopyroxene and garnet, resulting in seismic velocities up to 1% lower and densities 1-2% higher than the depleted nodular peridotites (Jordan 1979). Similarly, eclogitic mantle, if present (Shirey et al 2001), will have both lower velocity and higher density than depleted peridotitic mantle at the same temperature, although an inventory of mantle xenoliths of the Kaapvaal Craton suggests that the cratonic mantle is <1% eclogite by volume (Schulze 1989).…”
Section: Tectospheric Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith (1982) assumed that the heat pulse needed to drive this change was supplied to the base of the African lithosphere in the Mesozoic as it passed across the slightly hotter asthenosphere in a fixed plate tectonic reference framework, with uplift following about ~60 tõ 50 Ma, given a thermal time constant (thermal diffusivity) of about 60 million years. However, xenolith studies suggest that the eclogite volume in the southern African cratonic lithosphere is small (<1%; Schulze 1989) and because the phase transition upon heating near the Moho will be to garnet granulite rather than directly to basalt, this is apparently not a significant factor that could have controlled the marked uplift history of southern Africa. However, this could be a more important factor in the off-craton regions where there is evidence for mafic material in the upper mantle and lower crust (Durheim and Mooney, 1994;Carlson et al, 2006).…”
Section: Metasomatism In the Lithospheric Mantle Across Southern Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second model, imbrication of buoyant oceanic lithosphere during lateral tectonic accretion is responsible for forming SCLM [e.g., Helmstaedt and Schulze, 1989]. However, such a lateral tectonic accretion model implies a greater amount of eclogite in SCLM than is implied by mantle-derived xenoliths [Schulze, 1989]. A third, though less popular, model envisages SCLM as a result of continental collision [e.g., Jordan, 1978].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%