2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.02981.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the interpretation ofS-to-Preceiver functions

Abstract: S U M M A R YWe present results from forward modelling to study the feasibility of using S-to-P converted phases to image the seismic discontinuity structure of the crust and upper mantle. We show that a significant level of P-wave energy arriving before the direct S-wave arrival can interfere with the S-to-P converted phases of interest and may result in Sp receiver function phases that do not represent true earth structure. The source of this P-wave energy is attributable to a number of phases, including tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been concerns that higher-order P multiples could influence S precursors on the P component (Bock, 1994;Wilson et al, 2006). However, we do not see such phases in the complete observed precursor wave field in Fig.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 45%
“…There have been concerns that higher-order P multiples could influence S precursors on the P component (Bock, 1994;Wilson et al, 2006). However, we do not see such phases in the complete observed precursor wave field in Fig.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 45%
“…However, S wave receiver functions introduce additional data-processing complexities. Careful data culling and time windowing are required to avoid contamination by secondary S wave arrivals near the 84 S-SKS crossover distance [Wilson et al, 2006;Yuan et al, 2006]. Prior to deconvolution, the culled S wave traces are time-reversed to account for the precursory nature of S p scattering.…”
Section: Scattered Wave Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a given station, the converted Sp phase arrives earlier than the direct S phase, and S-to-P conversions upon refraction (Sp) across shallow discontinuities are best observed within the distance range mentioned earlier (Wilson et al 2006).…”
Section: Computation Of S-wave Receiver Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%