2012
DOI: 10.5209/rev_cuts.2012.v25.n1.38442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construcción y validación de una escala de buenas prácticas interculturales Construcción y validación de una escala de buenas prácticas interculturales en Trabajo Social

Abstract: Resumen El objetivo principal de este artículo es mostrar el proceso de construcción y validación de un instrumento de medida que permite delimitar qué puede ser considerado «buena práctica» en relación a proyectos interculturales. Este trabajo se enmarca dentro de una investigación más amplia denominada «Mapa de buenas prácticas interculturales en Andalucía» y que fue financiada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, descriptive statistics were adequate for each of the seven items developed. It should be mentioned that in order to obtain these results, three items of the scale had to be replaced, considering what also happened in previous research where some items were problematic and had to be removed [ 47 , 48 ]. It is probable that these items had to be replaced with others that were more culturally adjusted to represent the attitudes towards Maghrebis in Spain, and to fit better with the data [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, descriptive statistics were adequate for each of the seven items developed. It should be mentioned that in order to obtain these results, three items of the scale had to be replaced, considering what also happened in previous research where some items were problematic and had to be removed [ 47 , 48 ]. It is probable that these items had to be replaced with others that were more culturally adjusted to represent the attitudes towards Maghrebis in Spain, and to fit better with the data [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%