2012
DOI: 10.5539/hes.v2n2p138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct Validity Examination of Critical Thinking Dispositions for Undergraduate Students in University Putra Malaysia

Abstract: This research aims to evaluate the psychology properties of the construct validity for the Critical Thinking Disposition (CTD) instrument. The CTD instrument consists of 39 Likert-type items measuring seven dispositions, namely analyticity, open-mind, truth-seeking, systematicity, self-confidence inquisitiveness and maturity. The study involves 433 undergraduate students in University Putra Malaysia. The findings showed that the CTD has satisfactory construct validity with seven factors extracted and confirmed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
49
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The discriminant validity is assessed using average variance extracted (AVE). Discriminant validity “differentiates between one construct and another in the same mode” (Ghadi, Alwi, Bakar, & Talib, , p. 140). An AVE value of more than 0.7 is considered very good, whereas the level of 0.5 and above is acceptable (Hair, Black, Balin, & Anderson, ).…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminant validity is assessed using average variance extracted (AVE). Discriminant validity “differentiates between one construct and another in the same mode” (Ghadi, Alwi, Bakar, & Talib, , p. 140). An AVE value of more than 0.7 is considered very good, whereas the level of 0.5 and above is acceptable (Hair, Black, Balin, & Anderson, ).…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discriminant validity indicates a difference between one construct and another in the same model. (Ghadi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghadi et al [54] suggest that "(t)he validation emphasizes a logical analysis and tests the relationships predicated based on theoretical considerations". Therefore, we focused on the selections of essential necessities in a combined model from Ajzen's theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory by Stern et al, to investigate the effects of normative beliefs, social norms, and attitudes on pro-environmental behavior in Figure 3.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa)mentioning
confidence: 99%