2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2948847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing and Managing Multi-Granular Linguistic Values Based on Linguistic Terms and Their Fuzzy Sets

Abstract: Constructing and managing multi-granular linguistic values are more and more important for linguistic decision making in big data or social computing environments, linguistic variable is the fundamental of constructing and managing multi-granular linguistic values. Based on analysis of linguistic values and drawbacks of symbolic or fuzzy set methods in processing linguistic information, a linguistic value is expressed by a formal linguistic concept, which is constructed by a linguistic term and it's fuzzy sets… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H} is the set of all LIFSs on H. Inspired by the constructing and managing multi-granular linguistic values method proposed in [48], any IFS (µ(u), ν(u)) = ((a, b, c), (a , b , c )) on [0, 1] can be transformed into a LIFS on H as follows:…”
Section: B the Transformation Methods Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H} is the set of all LIFSs on H. Inspired by the constructing and managing multi-granular linguistic values method proposed in [48], any IFS (µ(u), ν(u)) = ((a, b, c), (a , b , c )) on [0, 1] can be transformed into a LIFS on H as follows:…”
Section: B the Transformation Methods Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real-world LDM problems, due to different knowledge level, background or experience, decision makers maybe provide multi-granular linguistic assessments of alternatives with respect to criteria. In multi-granular linguistic decision making methods, transformation functions are utilized to transform multi-granular linguistic terms from one linguistic hierarchy into other linguistic hierarchy [45]- [48], then linguistic aggregation operators or linguistic ordering methods are provided to carry out multi-granular linguistic decision problems. Similarly, in intuitionistic fuzzy decision environment, decision makers maybe provide IFV, IFS or LIFS assessments of alternatives with respect to criteria in the same intuitionistic fuzzy decision problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy linguistic representation model is the main issue of computing with words; in Yan et al (2019), computing with words is divided into three categories, i.e., via fuzzy sets of linguistic values, via fuzzy logic or algebra on the set of linguistic values and via an ordered structure of linguistic values. In LDM methods, computing with words via an ordered structure of linguistic values is also called as the symbolic model of fuzzy linguistic representation (Herrera and Martínez 2000), 2-TLM is the foundation of the symbolic model; formally, 2-TLM is consisted by a pair of elements (s j , α), where linguistic term s j is in an primary linguistic term set S = {s 0 , .…”
Section: Basic Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy linguistic representation model is the main issue of computing with words, in [38], computing with words are divided into three categories, i.e., via fuzzy sets of linguistic values, via fuzzy logic or algebra on the set of linguistic values and via an ordered structure of linguistic values. In LDM methods, computing with words via an ordered structure of linguistic values is also called as the symbolic model of fuzzy linguistic representation [8], 2-TLM is the foundation of the symbolic model, formally, 2-TLM is consisted by a pair of elements (s j , α), where linguistic term s j is in an primary linguistic term set S = {s 0 , • • • , s g } and α ∈ [−0.5, 0.5) is a numerical value that represents the value of the symbolic translation.…”
Section: Basic Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%