2019
DOI: 10.1177/1461444819881735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing audience quantification: Social influences and the development of norms about audience analytics and metrics

Abstract: Audience analytics and metrics are ubiquitous in today’s media environment. However, little is known about how creative media workers come to understand the social norms related to those technologies. Drawing on social influence theory, this study examines formal and informal socialization mechanisms in U.S. newsrooms. It finds that editorial newsworkers express receiving a moderate amount of training on the use of analytics and metrics, which is typically provided by their organization; primarily look to peop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may also serve a valuable signaling function wherein organizations can convey their commitments to certain ideals, and through which individuals-and insiders like newsroom developers in particular-can seek to gain reputational capital (Boyles, 2019). However, even if the amount of trade is limited, it may nevertheless prove influential if the individuals doing the trade are viewed as opinion leaders within their respective domains (see Zamith et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may also serve a valuable signaling function wherein organizations can convey their commitments to certain ideals, and through which individuals-and insiders like newsroom developers in particular-can seek to gain reputational capital (Boyles, 2019). However, even if the amount of trade is limited, it may nevertheless prove influential if the individuals doing the trade are viewed as opinion leaders within their respective domains (see Zamith et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, such spaces may be considered central to the formation of and enaction by "pioneer communities" (Hepp, 2016, p. 924), or collectives that help drive changes in the logics and practices linked to a particular domain (e.g., media). Trade may be consequential to the formation of norms and processes even if it only occurs among some members of distinct communities, so long as those individuals are viewed as opinion leaders within a domain (Zamith, Belair-Gagnon, & Lewis, 2019).…”
Section: Trading Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The profiling of users (Couldry & Turow, 2014;Turow, 2011); • The establishment of predictions (O'Neil, 2016); • The identification of metrics (Anderson, 2011;Zamith et al, 2019); • The visualisation of data (Engebretsen & Kennedy, 2020);…”
Section: Institutional Practices Of Media Actors (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, as we have entered the "media analytics stage" of technological media (Manovich 2018), audience metrics have come to the fore in these discussions, especially within the news industry, which relies on metrics not only to monitor audience behaviour but also, increasingly, as the preferred way to analyze the inner and perhaps unconscious motivations driving audience engagement (e.g American Press Institute 2019). Academics focusing on the institutional state-of-the-art understandably follow in tandem, researching the uses, feelings, and social integration of analytic systems (e.g., Tandoc 2019;Zamith, Belair-Gagnon, and Lewis 2019). However, marshalling data in this way conflates what metrics actually do (a system logic that aggregates measurable digital signals, and correlates this with pre-existent data through models, algorithms, and machine learning) with what they seem to imply (a market logic that hopes to predict people's preferences and predispositions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, marshalling data in this way conflates what metrics actually do (a system logic that aggregates measurable digital signals, and correlates this with pre-existent data through models, algorithms, and machine learning) with what they seem to imply (a market logic that hopes to predict people's preferences and predispositions). Within journalism studies, researchers have been preoccupied with the connections between audience metrics, engagement and news, arguing that engagement is a significant factor for the business models of digital-born and legacy news media (e.g., Batsell 2015;Nelson and Webster 2016), and that newsroom practices are increasingly shaped by the analysis of audience metrics in order to create news suited to engage the audience (e. g. Cherubini and Nielsen 2016;Ferrer-Conill and Tandoc 2018;Zamith, Belair-Gagnon, and Lewis 2019) even though the adoption of audience metrics in newsrooms might have been slower and less universal than first assumed (Nelson and Tandoc 2019). In recent years, new roles such as "engagement editor", "engagement reporter", "head of audience engagement" and similar titles have emerged in newsrooms, predominantly in the US, the UK and Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%