2019
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2019.1648401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing domestic retrofit as a new urban infrastructure: experimentation, equitability and contested priorities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The nature of funding for retrofit schemes could be designed to include practitioner engagement, monitoring and reflection on the process, rather than the 'just-in-time' nature of previous funding (Gorse et al 2017). This can then enable the preparation of the practitioners (Ince & Marvin 2019), as well as the supply chain (Osmani & O'Reilly 2009). This research considered the capabilities described in the practitioners' accounts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• The nature of funding for retrofit schemes could be designed to include practitioner engagement, monitoring and reflection on the process, rather than the 'just-in-time' nature of previous funding (Gorse et al 2017). This can then enable the preparation of the practitioners (Ince & Marvin 2019), as well as the supply chain (Osmani & O'Reilly 2009). This research considered the capabilities described in the practitioners' accounts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, place-based retrofit has required coalitions of practitioners in cities, from private businesses as well as voluntary organisations and local authorities, to experiment during times of particularly challenging policy conditions (Ince & Marvin 2019). Ince & Marvin (2019) suggest that a preparation phase allowing networks to be developed before delivery, could help 'normalise' retrofit demonstrator projects. This normalising is considered to be important as people are influenced by what others, both peers and wider societal networks, do (Nolan et al 2008).…”
Section: Background 21 Retrofit and Energy-efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canada issued a policy to establish a national infrastructure bank to overcome the severe financial and other difficulties faced by Canada's backward infrastructure in the renewal process, and to build new infrastructure to meet the new needs of society [31]. The British government launched "green deal" in 2011 to encourage local departments and private enterprises to transform backward urban infrastructure [32]. Philadelphia was looking for a green infrastructure based approach to address the lack of drainage infrastructure, while Washington, D.C. and Glasgow established implementation portfolio solutions [33].…”
Section: A Urban Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barriers and drivers that domestic energy retrofit agendas involve, including the different types of retrofit (single step, staged or deep), the fuel poverty metrics, and the limitations of strict eligibility criteria for financing interventions, have been thoroughly examined (Ben & Steemers 2020;Evans et al 2023;Wade & Visscher 2021). In terms of the feasibility of retrofitting, there are knowledge gaps and skills shortages, with a lack of qualified workers able to carry out the work and limited public resources to comprehensively address inequalities and deliver inclusive energy retrofits that specifically tackle households in fuel poverty (Clarke et al 2016;Ince & Marvin 2019). Given the importance of local-scale governance and leadership in addressing these opportunities and challenges, the complex interrelationship between national and local policy remains relatively unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%