2010
DOI: 10.1177/1476750309335206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing interorganizational collaboration

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThis article aims to explore critically the role of an action research team in the social construction of interorganizational collaboration aimed at transgressing organizational and professional boundaries. We argue that the new relationships, actor conceptions and in some cases forms of work organization arising from the change process have been socially constructed through the discursive interventions of the researchers. This has largely occurred through informal interaction with and between t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Helping participants speak for themselves was instrumental to designing an action and generating understanding among stakeholders (Coghlan and Brannick 2014). Within this setting, the research group acted as the intermediary (Huzzard et al 2010) among diverse stakeholders' perspectives, collecting relative interests and trying to get them involved. Specifically, the main duty of the research group was to propose different strategies to maintain the commitment of caregivers throughout the project and to raise the awareness of hospital professionals and Board concerning users that they did not perceive as their own.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Helping participants speak for themselves was instrumental to designing an action and generating understanding among stakeholders (Coghlan and Brannick 2014). Within this setting, the research group acted as the intermediary (Huzzard et al 2010) among diverse stakeholders' perspectives, collecting relative interests and trying to get them involved. Specifically, the main duty of the research group was to propose different strategies to maintain the commitment of caregivers throughout the project and to raise the awareness of hospital professionals and Board concerning users that they did not perceive as their own.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Board Directors of the hospital provided the stimulus to start an AR study in their setting because they needed to investigate the discharge planning system and family caregiver role and burden, and they asked the Head of the Nursing Department to study the topic. For this purpose, she created a multidisciplinary team (Huzzard et al 2010) with colleagues also from other disciplines (henceforth: research group).…”
Section: Role Of Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a key differentiator from our study, in which individuals possessing knowledge of the global financial system and of financial products actively participated. This is not to suggest that the researchers who participated in this study are representative of the entire domain; however, they do offer an expert if not entirely representative sample (Huzzard, Ahlberg, & Ekman, ).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, due to significant staff turnover and changes to the clinical program, it was not possible to implement the planned project in the example shared, highlighting the importance of lasting ties and the limitations that researchers can face. Nonetheless, by understanding and mediating multiple perspectives, the participatory researcher can serve as a boundary agent in the creation of new relationships (Huzzard et al, 2010). Current and future collaborations can more easily stem from these relationships, either in research or by fostering community relationships.…”
Section: Model Of the Sailing Shipmentioning
confidence: 99%