1989
DOI: 10.1017/s0004972700017391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing lattice-ordered fields and division rings

Abstract: Neumann's totally ordered power series fields and division rings may be tipped over to form archimedean lattice-ordered fields and division rings. This process is described and then generalised to produce non-archimedean lattice-ordered fields and division rings in wliich 1 > 0 and, as well, ones in which 1^0 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the positive cone of a subfield which satisfies condition (1) or (2) is contained in the set determined by condition (3). And then in section 4, we find several conditions, each of which is equivalent to this set being the positive cone of an osubfield of (L, +, ·, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the positive cone of a subfield which satisfies condition (1) or (2) is contained in the set determined by condition (3). And then in section 4, we find several conditions, each of which is equivalent to this set being the positive cone of an osubfield of (L, +, ·, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Then, as observed in [3], (L, +, ⊗ u , ) is an -field, where ⊗ u is defined by letting x ⊗ u y = xyu −1 . It is easy to see that the multiplicative identity of (L, +, ⊗ u , ) is u and hence we have the following Proposition 6.1.…”
Section: Changing the Multiplicationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the case of rooted groups, we also have the following. [5] Lattice-ordered power series fields 303 PROPOSITION [18] that every element of IW(>) is a locally inversely well-ordered subset of (A/A,, > ) , and hence there must exist n such that a k A t = a n A t for all k > n . But then A n a n A t contains the infinite set {a n , a n+l , a n+2 , ...}, which contradicts our choice of A e X(>).…”
Section: If (A->) Is a Totally Ordered Abelian Group Then Iw{>) Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Form the product n A T; for a € A and r e L, let a,r e]l A t be the vectors , {r a p), +, •), is a commutative ring with 7 = T as the multiplicative identity (cf. [4], [5], [13], [16], [20], [21], [22] [9], [13], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. When Ribenboim's convolution rings [20], [21], [22] are based on a group, they are a special case of this construction; he requires the supports to be locally inversely well-ordered and to have no infinite disjoint subsets.)…”
Section: Power Series Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation