2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2085721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Temporally Extended Actions through Incremental Community Detection

Abstract: Hierarchical reinforcement learning works on temporally extended actions or skills to facilitate learning. How to automatically form such abstraction is challenging, and many efforts tackle this issue in the options framework. While various approaches exist to construct options from different perspectives, few of them concentrate on options' adaptability during learning. This paper presents an algorithm to create options and enhance their quality online. Both aspects operate on detected communities of the lear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a skill to be obtained autonomously, the components of the triplet ⟨I, , ⟩ are needed. Therefore, there are many HRL studies that focus on detecting subgoals and/or defining initiation sets (Xu et al 2018;Simsek and Barreto 2008;Davoodabadi and Beigy 2011a, b;Shoeleh and Asadpour 2017;Kazemitabar et al 2018;Farahani and Mozayani 2019;Machado et al 2017;McGovern and Barto 2001;Stolle and Precup 2002;Şimşek and Barto 2004a;Ghafoorian et al 2013;Daniel et al 2016;Cockcroft et al 2020). Graph theoretic approaches are widely used for subgoal detection (Xu et al 2018;Simsek and Barreto 2008;Davoodabadi and Beigy 2011a, b;Shoeleh and Asadpour 2017;Kazemitabar et al 2018;Farahani and Mozayani 2019;Machado et al 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For a skill to be obtained autonomously, the components of the triplet ⟨I, , ⟩ are needed. Therefore, there are many HRL studies that focus on detecting subgoals and/or defining initiation sets (Xu et al 2018;Simsek and Barreto 2008;Davoodabadi and Beigy 2011a, b;Shoeleh and Asadpour 2017;Kazemitabar et al 2018;Farahani and Mozayani 2019;Machado et al 2017;McGovern and Barto 2001;Stolle and Precup 2002;Şimşek and Barto 2004a;Ghafoorian et al 2013;Daniel et al 2016;Cockcroft et al 2020). Graph theoretic approaches are widely used for subgoal detection (Xu et al 2018;Simsek and Barreto 2008;Davoodabadi and Beigy 2011a, b;Shoeleh and Asadpour 2017;Kazemitabar et al 2018;Farahani and Mozayani 2019;Machado et al 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are many HRL studies that focus on detecting subgoals and/or defining initiation sets (Xu et al 2018;Simsek and Barreto 2008;Davoodabadi and Beigy 2011a, b;Shoeleh and Asadpour 2017;Kazemitabar et al 2018;Farahani and Mozayani 2019;Machado et al 2017;McGovern and Barto 2001;Stolle and Precup 2002;Şimşek and Barto 2004a;Ghafoorian et al 2013;Daniel et al 2016;Cockcroft et al 2020). Graph theoretic approaches are widely used for subgoal detection (Xu et al 2018;Simsek and Barreto 2008;Davoodabadi and Beigy 2011a, b;Shoeleh and Asadpour 2017;Kazemitabar et al 2018;Farahani and Mozayani 2019;Machado et al 2017). Some of these studies apply different community detection algorithms to identify initiation sets besides detecting subgoals (Xu et al 2018;Davoodabadi and Beigy 2011a, b;Shoeleh and Asadpour 2017;Farahani and Mozayani 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations