2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-011-5248-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and learnability of canonical Horn formulas

Abstract: We describe an alternative construction of an existing canonical representation for definite Horn theories, the Guigues-Duquenne basis (or GD basis), which minimizes a natural notion of implicational size. We extend the canonical representation to general Horn, by providing a reduction from definite to general Horn CNF. Using these tools, we provide a new, simpler validation of the classic Horn query learning algorithm of Angluin, Frazier, and Pitt, and we prove that this algorithm always outputs the GD basis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this algorithm, it is possible to learn implicational theories from equivalence and membership oracles alone. Indeed, the resulting set H of implications is always the canonical basis equivalent to L [5]. Moreover, the algorithm always runs in polynomial time in |M | and the size of the sought implication basis [4,Theorem 2].…”
Section: How To Compute Probably Approximately Correct Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this algorithm, it is possible to learn implicational theories from equivalence and membership oracles alone. Indeed, the resulting set H of implications is always the canonical basis equivalent to L [5]. Moreover, the algorithm always runs in polynomial time in |M | and the size of the sought implication basis [4,Theorem 2].…”
Section: How To Compute Probably Approximately Correct Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assignment x ∈ {0, 1} n satisfies the implication α → β, denoted x |= α → β, if it either falsifies the antecedent or satisfies the consequent, that is, x |= α or x |= β respectively, where now we are interpreting both α and β as positive terms (x |= α if and only if α ⊆ [x] if and only if [α] ≤ x, see Lemma 1 of [14]).…”
Section: Horn Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assignment x is said to be closed iff x ⋆ = x, and similarly for variable sets. The following holds for every definite Horn function f (see Theorem 3 in [14]):…”
Section: Closure Operator and Equivalence Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations