1995
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.66.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of a scale for independent and interdependent construal of the self and its reliability and validity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale consists of 16 items that ask about independent and interdependent construal of the self. Kiuchi (1995) demonstrated that the scale had a one-factor structure and good reliability (Cronbach a= 27). Each item in the scale is phrased as either interdependent (Statement A) or independent (Statement B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scale consists of 16 items that ask about independent and interdependent construal of the self. Kiuchi (1995) demonstrated that the scale had a one-factor structure and good reliability (Cronbach a= 27). Each item in the scale is phrased as either interdependent (Statement A) or independent (Statement B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Scale for Independent and Interdependent Construal of The Se@-Construal of the self was measured by a scale that is based upon a hypothetical model of independent and interdependent construal of the self (Kiuchi, 1995). The scale consists of 16 items that ask about independent and interdependent construal of the self.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Scale for Independent and Interdependent construal of the self (SII) developed by Kiuchi [32] was used to measure the tendency for self-construal. This scale consists of 16 items where each item consists of two different statements such as A and B.…”
Section: Measurements Independent and Interdependent Construal Of Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Kernis and Goldman (2006) reported the correlations between authenticity and various indicators of mental health or well-being, such as self-actualization, vitality, psychological stress, mindfulness, identity integration, and eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Ito and Kodama (2007) reported that scores on the Sense of Authenticity Scale (β = .43, p < .01) were associated with positive affect as measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) even after controlling for cultural construal of self (Kiuchi, 1995). This observation suggests that a sense of authenticity may influence the affective aspect of well-being, regardless of individual differences in cultural orientation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%