“…The sloping fluctuation in potential in discharge curves displayed their pseudocapacitive character, which may be attributed to the faradaic reactions at the electrolyte–electrode interface. 63,65 Using eqn (11), where C s (F g −1 ), I / m (A g −1 ), Δ t (s), and Δ V (V) are the specific capacitance, current density, discharge time, and potential window, respectively, 77 MoO 3 @Ni foam had C s values of 1220, 1040, 988, 855, 800 and 733 F g −1 at current densities of 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 A g −1 , while Ag 2 MoO 4 @Ni foam had C s values of 1695, 1580, 1255, 1057, 977 and 933 F g −1 at the same current densities.
The calculated C s values in this work were compared with previously reported values (see Table 2). The difference in the results may be related to the variety of morphology, specific surface area, preparation method, number of electroactive sites, phase purity and conductivity of the nanoparticles.…”