2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-3045-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of collaborative mapping engine for dynamic disaster and emergency response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method can set different visualization preferences and demand information for the kinds of landslide disaster objects involved (e.g. ordinary people, victims, rescue teams, and experts in the field of emergency) (Peng et al 2018 ; Steichen et al 2014 ). Relying on the above approach, they developed a prototype system.…”
Section: Simulation Training Systems Based On Different Phases Of Eme...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can set different visualization preferences and demand information for the kinds of landslide disaster objects involved (e.g. ordinary people, victims, rescue teams, and experts in the field of emergency) (Peng et al 2018 ; Steichen et al 2014 ). Relying on the above approach, they developed a prototype system.…”
Section: Simulation Training Systems Based On Different Phases Of Eme...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, through certain rules regarding data selection, the disaster view-only visualization scene, disaster information analytical visualization scene and disaster rescue explorative visualization scene are established to form the presentation layer of the virtual debris flow disaster environment. According to the professional knowledge backgrounds and the tasks of users in debris flow disaster emergency response scenarios, the participants involved in relevant tasks can be divided into four categories: guidance experts, rescue teams, disaster victims and ordinary people [18]. Additionally, visualization terminals can be divided into desktop and mobile terminals, which constitute the user layer of the virtual debris flow disaster environment.…”
Section: Framework Of Virtual Debris Flow Disaster Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with a general VGE, the construction of a virtual disaster environment must consider a large variety of multisource and related disaster data; therefore, the presentation of a virtual disaster environment is highly complicated. Additionally, a large number of relevant individuals are involved in the disaster emergency process; these participants with different professional knowledge backgrounds are usually located in different areas and use diverse visualization terminals [18][19][20]. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the locations, professional knowledge backgrounds, and diverse visualization terminals of users in disaster emergency response scenarios to adaptively construct virtual debris flow disaster environments for diverse visualization task requirements [21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 7 publications that approach conceptual frameworks, without implementations, it is possible to highlight the one presented in [19], where the need for a platform that unifies information from several collaborative sources and supports the actions of first responders in the emergency is raised. Currently, libraries are capable of representing disasters and related information, but are not able to map them, either static or dynamically, because they do not have specific symbols for it, the various areas of expertise and responsibilities of the cartographers involved must be considered.…”
Section: Execution Of Database Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%