“…In many cases, temperature stimulation can be efficiently designed and manually controlled with temperature as one of the most common stimuli, which has attracted many researchers to develop advanced thermal-responsive materials in different fields, such as in reversible thermal responsive poly-acrylamide (PAAM)/poly(acrylic acid) (PAAC)-based porous gated membranes, polycaprolactone (PCL)-based thermal phase-change materials (TPCM) with shape memory functions, and thermosensitive polyoxometalate (POM)-based memristors . Regarding MOFs, there are a few examples to build thermal-responsive MOFs, such as by introducing a thermal-responsive molecule (poly( N -isopropyl acrylamide), PNIPAM) into UIO-66 and MIL-101, applying a controlled release of drugs and water capture/release, respectively. − In addition, some thermal-responsive MOFs have been directly prepared by grafting functional groups, such as [Cu 2 (BTR) 2 ]·2NO 3 · x G (BTR = 4,4′-bis(1,2,4-triazole)), which has a thermal-response gated adsorption behavior, which depends on the thermal movement of NO 3– counterions on the frame, thus giving the MOF strong selection and adsorption performance for CO 2 molecules; a Cu-based MOF with a butterfly-type ligand comprising isophthalic acid (ipa) and phenothiazine-5,5-dioxide moieties (OPTz) that process the ability of temperature-induced pore size changes that allow precise control of the diffusion of gas molecules; and a 3D Sr-based MOF using tetraphenylethylene as an organic ligand, which has reversible thermosensitive fluorescence luminescence derived from the chromophore of TPE in manufacturing biological detection devices with switching properties . However, thermal-responsive MOF materials are emerging in an endless stream, but they are rarely involved in proton conduction.…”