Construction of Justice, Certainty, and Legal Use in the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018.

Abstract

Abstract.The decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018 has triggered the division of the legal paradigm in Indonesia. The philosophical discourse between justice, certainty, and the legal use in the reality of Indonesian law reflects the strong grip of legal positivism that resides in the Supreme Court's decision and causes a waning sense of justice and public hope to obtain a track record of candidates who are proper and with integrity. This study aims to explain the philosophical dialectic between justice, certainty, and legal use in PMA No. 46 of 2018 while expressing a representation of justice, construction of legal certainty and legal use that is incarnated according to the judge's consideration in the decision. The approach through justice theory John Stuart Mill and John Rawls will be used to slice the conception of justice, certainty, and legal use that resides in the decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM /2018. This research is a normative-philosophical legal research. The results showed that the construction of justice imprinted in the verdict tended to project the concept of justice as equality (justice as fairness) from John Rawls, this can be seen from the consideration of judges contained in decisions emphasizing individual freedom (political rights, elected and elected) as a form of efforts to strengthen libertarian rights or natural rights that cannot be negated by the freedom of others. The aspects of legal benefit and certainty reflect the grip of the positivistic paradigm in law. This is reflected in two lines of consideration, firstly there is no consideration of the common interest (the greatest benefit) in the decision which is a test stone to see the implications of the prohibition norm for former convicted corruption for the future of parliament and the regeneration of people's representatives. Whereas the aspect of legal certainty in the decision only touches the legal realm as lex and negates the ontological basis of the law as an ius which is full of consideration of morality and justice ideas without trying to reveal what is behind the text (meta-teleological aspects) PKPU No. 20 of 2018. Thus, three legal values (certainty, legal use, and justice) should have an equally important position within the framework of the state legal system. When all three are in conflict, the central role of the judge's duty to equally apply the three legal objectives.Keywords: Justice, certainty, legal use, Law, Supreme Court Decision.

Land Bank Agency and Participation of Indigenous Peoples: Where is the Legal Certainty?

“…In the view of Jan Michiel Otto, legal certainty can be achieved if the substance of the law is in line with the community's needs. Regulations that can create legal certainty are regulations that can reflect the culture that develops in society (Hazmi et al, 2021). The culture that develops in society is an illustration of the coveted needs of society so that regulations that follow the culture of society will later be able to create harmony between the interests of the state and society.…”

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Bantuan Sosial Covid-19 Berdasarkan Pendekatan Kerangka Antikorupsi Dan Teori Keadilan

“…Dengan demikian, tampak alamiah untuk berpikir tentang konsep keadilan yang berbeda dari berbagai konsepsi keadilan yang sama-sama mempunyai berbagai prinsip dan konsep (Himma & Bix, 2017). Maka, disaat tidak adanya ukuran tertentu mengenai kesepakatan terkait penentuan sisi keadilan atau tidak berkeadilan, jelas lebih sulit lagi bagi para individu untuk mengkoordinasikan rencana-rencana secara efisien dalam rangka menjamin tatanan yang dijalankan saling menguntungkan untuk tetap dipertahankan (Hazmi et al, 2021). Salah satu cara melihat dengan nyata keberadaan suatu keadilan hadir di masyarakat adalah dengan menemukan suatu konstitusi terkait distribusi keadilan dan dengan melihat implementasinya kepada (Asshidiqie, 2007).…”

From Bullying to Cyberbullying: Typology, Dialectics and Mitigation of MAN 1 Students, Tanah Datar Regency, West Sumatra Province

“…Kusmaryanto, 2021;Rudy, 2013) Dengan begitu, diperlukan campur tangan negara untuk memberikan titik keseimbangan dalam pelaksanaan hak dan kewajiban ini karena negara merupakan fasilitator untuk menjaga dua yang berbeda pada konteks hak dan kewajiban asasi tersebut. (Jahar et al, 2021) Di dalam proses penyampaian materi pada sosialisasi pengabdian ini, para siswa sangat antusias menyimak penjabaran dari para narasumber. Tidak terkecuali bagi para guru juga ikut antusias melihat praktek-praktek penegakan hukum dan fenomena penyimpangan hukum yang diakibatkan oleh cyberbyllying tersebut.…”