2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0960129521000359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructive sheaf models of type theory

Abstract: We provide a constructive version of the notion of sheaf models of univalent type theory. We start by relativizing existing constructive models of univalent type theory to presheaves over a base category. Any Grothendieck topology of the base category then gives rise to a family of left-exact modalities, and we recover a model of type theory by localizing the presheaf model with respect to this family of left-exact modalities. We provide then some examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By assumption, this is a filtered colimit and thus it commutes with finite limits. Since limits are computed pointwise in [C, Set], we may identify (lim X)(c) = lim i X i (c) and compute: We can now prove proposition 4.11: For (1) these topoi satisfy the Orton-Pitts axioms as noted in [CRS21]. To see that the intervals defined above are tiny we proceed as follows: Using the Yoneda lemma along with the fact that I is naturally isomorphic to [−, {i}] shows that y(c, I) × I ∼ = y(c, I + {i}), and we thus calculate:…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By assumption, this is a filtered colimit and thus it commutes with finite limits. Since limits are computed pointwise in [C, Set], we may identify (lim X)(c) = lim i X i (c) and compute: We can now prove proposition 4.11: For (1) these topoi satisfy the Orton-Pitts axioms as noted in [CRS21]. To see that the intervals defined above are tiny we proceed as follows: Using the Yoneda lemma along with the fact that I is naturally isomorphic to [−, {i}] shows that y(c, I) × I ∼ = y(c, I + {i}), and we thus calculate:…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We will construct a lex modality where Church's thesis is forced to hold, and then use properties of cubical assemblies to show that the modality is non-trivial. Our model can also be viewed as a kind of stack model akin to those used by Coquand, Ruch and Sattler for various independence and consistency results, including the independence of countable choice from homotopy type theory (Coquand et al 2021), although our formulation will be quite different to theirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%