2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production

Abstract: The literature on public perceptions of, and attitudes towards, nanotechnology used in the agrifood sector is reviewed. Research into consumer perceptions and attitudes has focused on general applications of nanotechnology, rather than within the agrifood sector. Perceptions of risk and benefit associated with different applications of nanotechnology, including agri-food applications, shape consumer attitudes, and acceptance, together with ethical concerns related to environmental impact or animal welfare. Att… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Frewer et al (2014) have speculated that the lack of consumer opposition to nanotechnology as currently observed may be attributable to the following. First, innovative technological innovation applied to food production per se is not societally unacceptable.…”
Section: Issn 1789-7874mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frewer et al (2014) have speculated that the lack of consumer opposition to nanotechnology as currently observed may be attributable to the following. First, innovative technological innovation applied to food production per se is not societally unacceptable.…”
Section: Issn 1789-7874mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second argument, that it is too early in the implementation trajectory for consumer attitudes towards specific applications of both agrifood nanotechnology and synthetic biology to have crystallized, is potentially valid (Frewer et al, 2014). However, given that labelled nanotechnology consumer products are apparently accepted by many consumers who use them (e.g.…”
Section: Issn 1789-7874mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the public perceives the use of nanomaterials acceptable in packaging applications while the use of nanomaterials in food relatively risky. [22][23][24][25] However, these results suggest that people would reject nanotechnology if they incur any health risk of nanoparticles in the application, regardless of whether the use is in packaging or food. Nowadays, nanomaterials are at the forefront of food packaging research and development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The 'innovation' referred to in this paper does not directly relate to 'break-though' research (for example, the development of novel technologies) but rather how these technologies are applied to the agrifood sector. For example, there is considerable evidence to suggest that emerging technologies such as genetic modification, nanotechnology or synthetic biology are (largely) acceptable to the public, but that when these are applied within a specific sector the risks perceived by the public must be outweighed by the associated benefits of their application (Frewer et al, 2014). However, the results of the research may equally apply to other forms of product innovation where consumer acceptance is required, but which do not necessarily involve the application of emerging technologies, in order to 'finetune' new food innovations in alignment with consumer expectations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%