Consumer innovativeness model of Indonesian young consumers in relation with electronic products adoption

Nasution, Reza Ashari; Astuti, Novika Candra

doi:10.1109/ice.2012.6297641

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…, 2017), but the study results still vary among scholars. Nasution and Astuti (2012) found that DSI may not be a good predictor of new product adoption behavior for electronic products because of the different levels of the two measured constructs. Chao et al.…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…DSI developed by Goldsmith and Hofacker (1991) is commonly accepted by many researchers (Kim et al, 2017), but the study results still vary among scholars. Nasution and Astuti (2012) found that DSI may not be a good predictor of new product adoption behavior for electronic products because of the different levels of the two measured constructs. Chao et al (2012) showed that the relationship between DSI and actual new product adoption is quite weak, even if positive.…”

Section: Consumer Innovativenessmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Most researchers have thus far primarily discussed the direct effect of CI on new product adoption behavior (Roehrich, 2004;Im et al, 2003;Hauser et al, 2006;Bartels and Reinders, 2011;Al-Jundi et al, 2019;Nasution and Astuti, 2012;Chao et al, 2012Chao et al, , 2013Kwon, 2011). The problem here is that narrowing the discussions to direct effects entails ignoring the underlying mechanisms of the relationship; this lack of discussion about indirect effects highlights the importance of examining the indirect relationship between CI and technostress.…”

Section: H2c Sin Is Negatively Related To Cpxmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Higher innovativeness, lower technostress?: comparative study of determinants on FinTech usage behavior between Korean and Chinese Gen Z consumers

Lee

2022

APJML

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe study aims to verify and compare the relationship of consumer innovativeness and technostress for FinTech usage behavior of Korean and Chinese Gen Z consumers.Design/methodology/approachThe study proposes an integrative causal model derived from consumer innovativeness, technostress, and FinTech usage intention of the Korean and Chinese Gen Z consumers and test the causal relationships using structural equation modeling (SEM).FindingsThe study results showed that social innovativeness negatively affected the three dimensions of technostress and had a significant positive impact on FinTech usage intention for all samples. Hedonist innovativeness had no significant positive impact on FinTech usage intention for all samples, but it differently affected the three sub-dimensions of technostress (uncertainty, invasion, and complexity) for each sample.Originality/valueThis study presents nascent literature on the causal relationships of consumer innovativeness, technostress, and FinTech usage behavior for Korean and Chinese Gen Z consumers.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 96%