1995
DOI: 10.2307/1243366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Perceptions of Aquaculture Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nauman et al 9 applied logit techniques to model experience, perceptions, preferences, choices of consumers for fresh hybrid striped bass, trout and salmon. Gempesaw et al 26 used the logit model to examine the American consumer choices of north-eastern farmed seafood products including hybrid stiped bass, trout, salmon, mussels, clams and oysters. Houston and Li 27 utilized the logit model to identify factors affecting consumer choice of shrimp in Taiwan.…”
Section: The Model and Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nauman et al 9 applied logit techniques to model experience, perceptions, preferences, choices of consumers for fresh hybrid striped bass, trout and salmon. Gempesaw et al 26 used the logit model to examine the American consumer choices of north-eastern farmed seafood products including hybrid stiped bass, trout, salmon, mussels, clams and oysters. Houston and Li 27 utilized the logit model to identify factors affecting consumer choice of shrimp in Taiwan.…”
Section: The Model and Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key finding, discussed in several studies, was that consumers often lack knowledge regarding aquaculture species and farming practices (Ii et al, 1995;Honkanen and Olsen, 2008;Robertson et al, 2002;Vanhonacker et al, 2011;Verbeke et al, 2007), including Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture (IMTA) (Barrington et al, 2010;Shuve et al, 2009). One study investigating consumers' willingness to pay for aquaculture species found that respondents would pay more for wild-caught fish (Davidson et al, 2012), but another found that consumers would pay a price premium for farmed fish should there be improvements to environmental impact (Whitmarsh and Wattage, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If IMTA is to be acceptable in the mind of the general public, the biological potential of the species in question must be appropriate to the environment, the local communities should benefit, and consumers must be willing to purchase the end product (Gempesaw et al 1995). The IMTA concept seems to remedy some environmental effects of salmon farming; it also has positive economic benefits for the farmer because diversification generates additional revenues while reducing risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%