Consumer perceptions of beef healthiness: results from a qualitative study in four European countries

Abstract

BackgroundConsumer perception of the healthiness of beef is an important determinant of beef consumption. However, little is known about how consumers perceive the healthiness of beef. The aim of this study is to shed light on the associations between beef and health.MethodsEight focus group discussions were conducted in four European countries (France, UK, Germany, Spain), each consisting of seven to nine participants. A content analysis was performed on the transcripts of these discussions.ResultsAlthough beef was generally perceived as healthful, focus group participants expected positive as well as negative effects of beef consumption on their health. Labelled, branded, fresh and lean beef were perceived as signalling healthful beef, in contrast with further processed and packaged beef. Consumers felt that their individual choices could make a difference with respect to the healthiness of beef consumed. Focus group participants were not in favour of improving beef healthiness during processing, but rather focussed on appropriate consumption behaviour and preparation methods.ConclusionsThe individual responsibility for health implies that consumers should be able to make correct judgements about how healthful their food is. However, the results of this study indicate that an accurate assessment of beef healthiness is not always straightforward. The presented results on consumer perceptions of beef healthiness provide insights into consumer decision making processes, which are important for the innovation and product differentiation in the European beef sector, as well as for public health policy decisions related to meat consumption in general and beef consumption in particular.

What are the key factors influencing consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for meat products in EasternDRC?

“…Alemu, Olsen, Vedel, Pambo, and Owino (2017) showed that preferences in Kenya are also influenced by context and information in addition to product attributes. Van Wezemael, Verbeke, de Barcellos, Scholderer, and Perez‐Cueto (2010) also reported that European consumers considered label, brand, freshness, and leanness of beef as cues to indicate quality to purchase, whereas safety in Ghana and hygiene in Rwanda were purchasing attributes in purchasing meat products (Niyonzima et al., 2017; Owusu‐Sekyere, Owusu, & Jordaan, 2014). However, most of the studies on consumers’ preferences for meat products focus on developed countries (Tonsor et al., 2005; Reicks et al., 2011; Schumacher, Schroeder, & Tonsor, 2012; Zimmerman et al., 2012; Hung, de Kok, & Verbeke, 2016; Shan et al., 2017).…”

Understanding the Relationship Between Perceived Quality Cues and Quality Attributes in the Purchase of Meat in Malaysia

“…Van Wezemael et al (2010) found that consumers have a greater preference for fresh beef compared to processed and packaged beef because freshness signals the healthfulness of the meat.…”

Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: a review of influence factors

“…It requires supportive government policies and practices, new and different business practices and civil society initiatives working in synergy (Dibb and Fitzpatrick 2014;Biesbroek et al 2013;Darnton and Evans 2013;Garnett et al 2015b;Thøgerson 2014;Westhoek et al 2011). While several authors still claim that ''advocating for reduced meat consumption as part of healthy sustainable diets has not yet translated into policies and practices from government to support consumer behaviour change'' (Dibb and Fitzpatrick 2014, p. 5;Dagevos and Voordouw 2013;Laestadius et al 2014;Bailey et al 2014;Westhoek et al 2011), it is evident that a variety of institutions have already started to take action and/or are preparing to do so. This includes governments in countries such as China, where the government is running a major campaign employing well-known U.S. actors such as Arnold Schwarzenegger (The Guardian 2016), and Germany, where reducing meat consumption is now included in the climate goals (BMUB 2016).…”

“…Reducing ruminant meat and dairy products has the highest impact on GHG emissions compared to other foods (Gerber et al 2013;Hedenus et al 2014;Meier and Christen 2013). However, the question of how to achieve this change in dietary behaviour in the direction of reduced meat consumption as well as animal product consumption in general has yet to receive the attention it deserves (Dibb and Fitzpatrick 2014;Laestadius et al 2013;Westhoek et al 2011).…”

“…In total, 65 % of the expansion in land use between 1960 and 2011 is due to increased production of animal products (Alexander et al 2015). Westhoek et al (2011) estimate that animal husbandry accounts for roughly 30 % of current global biodiversity loss, primarily as the result of changes in land use. To increase yields without further expansion of land use, high levels of fertilisers and pesticides are used (Cassman 1999;Tilman et al 2002;Wirsenius et al 2010).…”