2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2013.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Response to Package Downsizing: Evidence from the Chicago Ice Cream Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same principle applies also to the framing of price increases: the elasticity of package size is about one fourth that of price elasticity (Çakır & Balagtas, 2014). Presenting an otherwise identical price change as package-size reduction thus leads to a lower sales loss than a straight price increase.…”
Section: Framingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The same principle applies also to the framing of price increases: the elasticity of package size is about one fourth that of price elasticity (Çakır & Balagtas, 2014). Presenting an otherwise identical price change as package-size reduction thus leads to a lower sales loss than a straight price increase.…”
Section: Framingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If the substitution effects between NBs and SBs are not symmetric, the portfolio effect on NB and SB prices will be different. Empirical evidence supports nonsymmetry of substitution effects, showing that NB prices are not very responsive to price changes of SBs, however the opposite is true for SB prices responding to NB price changes (Cotterill, Putsis, & Dhar, ; Çakır & Balagtas, ).…”
Section: Food Retail Merger Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although nowadays the concept of JND in its' narrow interpretation is typically a matter of research in sensory perception analysis, marketing studies related to JND in broader terms can also be found -i.e. for package downsizing (Çakır & Balagtas, 2014), word-of-mouth marketing (King, Racherla, & Bush, 2014), website changes (Ainsworth & Ballantine, 2014) or price changes (Han, Gupta, & Lehmann, 2001). …”
Section: The Concept Of Just Noticeable Difference In Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%