2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-017-3159-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption rates of a key marine herbivore: a review of the extrinsic and intrinsic control of feeding in the green sea urchin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomass values account for both size and abundance of specimens (density is the most common metric in sea urchin studies, e.g., Palacín et al, 1998;Tuya et al, 2004b;Lessios, 2016), which is crucial when comparing populations that are not homogeneous in size structure, as reported for Arraial do Cabo (see Cordeiro et al, 2014). Few studies have considered the biomass of sea urchins as a variable on tropical reefs, especially in the Caribbean, despite this being the most robust metric for assessing effects of grazing (Suskiewicz and Johnson, 2017). Studies in East Africa coral reefs indicated biomass values between 50.1 to 609.5 g m −2 (Humphries et al, 2014) in areas where sea urchins showed significant control over macroalgal cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass values account for both size and abundance of specimens (density is the most common metric in sea urchin studies, e.g., Palacín et al, 1998;Tuya et al, 2004b;Lessios, 2016), which is crucial when comparing populations that are not homogeneous in size structure, as reported for Arraial do Cabo (see Cordeiro et al, 2014). Few studies have considered the biomass of sea urchins as a variable on tropical reefs, especially in the Caribbean, despite this being the most robust metric for assessing effects of grazing (Suskiewicz and Johnson, 2017). Studies in East Africa coral reefs indicated biomass values between 50.1 to 609.5 g m −2 (Humphries et al, 2014) in areas where sea urchins showed significant control over macroalgal cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their highlight article, Suskiewicz and Johnson (2017) review the scientific literature dealing with the control of feeding of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, and discuss the ecological implications of their findings. The phenomenon of sea urchins overgrazing marine temperate macroalgae (such as large kelp) leading to the transition of highly productive macroalgal forests into marine deserts in the form of barren urchin grounds (Fig.…”
Section: Nos Numerus Sumus Et Fruges Consumere Natimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to succeed in these "higher" goals, however, the examined laboratory-based studies and their inherent information need to be scaled up to the whole-ecosystem context, as also the authors meritoriously point out (Suskiewicz and Johnson 2017). This could be done by well-designed experiments in controlled mesocosms or in the field under natural background levels of environmental variables and natural species compositions of macroalgal assemblages coupled with realistic levels of naturally behaving sea urchins, competing herbivores and predators.…”
Section: Nos Numerus Sumus Et Fruges Consumere Natimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kata kunci: Bulu Babi; penyuluhana; keramba jaring apung PENDAHULUAN Bulu Babi (sea urchin) yang juga dikenal dengan nama landak laut merupakan salah satu biota laut avertebrata pemakan tumbuhan atau herbivora (Suskiewicz & Johnson, 2017) dari filum Echinodermata yang telurnya dapat dikonsumsi baik dalam keadaan segar (Nane, 2019a;Santos-Ferreira, 2020) maupun olahan (Nane, 2020). Telur Bulu Babi ini telah menjadi salah satu sumber daya perikanan komersial dunia (Bertocci, 2018) karena memiliki gizi yang baik dan diperdagangkan secara global.…”
unclassified