Consumption-Related Health Education Inequality in COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in China

Abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic influences various aspects of society, especially for people with low socioeconomic status. Health education has been proven to be a critical strategy in preventing a pandemic. However, socioeconomic characteristics may limit health education among low socioeconomic status groups. This study explores consumption-related health education inequality and the factors that contribute to this, which are variable across China during COVID-19.MethodsThe 2020 China COVID-19 Survey is a cross-sectional study in China, based on an anonymous online survey from 7,715 samples in 85 cities. It employed machine-learning methods to assess household consumption and other contributing variates associated with health education during the pandemic. Concentration Index (CI) and Horizontal Index (HI) were used to measure consumption-related inequalities in health education, respectively. Moreover, Wagstaff decomposition analysis was employed to identify other contributing variables to health education inequality.ResultsThe result indicates that participants with more education, better income, and positive consumption preferences undertake higher health education during COVID-19. The CI and HI of consumption-health education inequality are 0.0321 (P < 0.001) and 0.0416 (p < 0.001), respectively, which indicates that health education is concentrated in wealthy groups. We adapted Lasso regression to solve issues and omit variables. In terms of other socioeconomic characteristics, Annual Income was also a major contributor to health education inequalities, accounting for 27.1% (P < 0.001). The empirical results also suggests that education, health status, identification residence, and medical health insurance contribute to health education inequality.ConclusionsThe difference in Household consumption, annual income, rural and urban disparity, and private healthcare insurance are critical drivers of health education inequality. The government should pay more attention to promoting health education, and healthcare subside policy among vulnerable people. Significantly to improve awareness of undertaking health education with lower education, rural residential, to enhance confidence in economic recovery and life after COVID-19.

Syndemic: A Synergistic Anthropological Approach to the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Health care providers also have to pull their weight. Examining the available data and evidence on health inequalities represents a valuable starting to point to identify weaknesses and try to fix them [41].…”

The Impact of the Zero-COVID Policy on Income Inequality in China

“…As results show, there are certain groups of people who are more vulnerable, and thus affected more by the policy, which has led to an increase in income inequality. Results show that there indeed has been an increased income inequality since the pre-pandemic period, and that the zero-covid policy has had different effects on different regions, with those in rural regions being affected the most, with the lowest recovery speed and highest income inequality [8]. There were also different effects among the regions, showing the effects on different types of workers.…”

Association between social support and the severity of positive symptoms in rural community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…A survey conducted in rural China during the pandemic revealed that the proportion of telemedicine use was low owing to the barriers of a lack of equipment and knowledge regarding telemedicine access and a lack of trust in and demand for telemedicine [ 36 ]. In addition, health literacy is positively correlated to COVID-19 knowledge, and residents in rural areas have lower health literacy but a lower level of health education on COVID-19 than residents in urban areas [ 37 , 38 ].…”