2004
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.664.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumptive Use Program (Cup) Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cumulative ET for the entire crop season attributed to irrigation is given by ETi=CDswΔWC=(CETcCEspgCEr)ΔWC=i=1nNAi where ET i is ET of applied water (i.e., irrigation), CD sw is the cumulative daily change in soil water content, ΔWC is the difference between initial and final soil water content, and NA i is the net water application. CET c , CE spg , and CE r are the seasonal cumulative crop evapotranspiration, cumulative effective seepage, and cumulative effective rainfall contribution, respectively [ Orang et al ., ]. CUP+ does not distinguish between E and T and does not incorporate capillary rise, unlike other ET models used to determine high‐resolution water footprints [ Chukalla et al ., ; Zhuo et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative ET for the entire crop season attributed to irrigation is given by ETi=CDswΔWC=(CETcCEspgCEr)ΔWC=i=1nNAi where ET i is ET of applied water (i.e., irrigation), CD sw is the cumulative daily change in soil water content, ΔWC is the difference between initial and final soil water content, and NA i is the net water application. CET c , CE spg , and CE r are the seasonal cumulative crop evapotranspiration, cumulative effective seepage, and cumulative effective rainfall contribution, respectively [ Orang et al ., ]. CUP+ does not distinguish between E and T and does not incorporate capillary rise, unlike other ET models used to determine high‐resolution water footprints [ Chukalla et al ., ; Zhuo et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spreadsheet and Windows-based irrigation scheduling programs, such as CROPWAT [60], KanSched 2.0, Basic Irrigation Scheduling (BIS) [61], and consumptive use program (CUP) [62] automate the irrigation scheduling calculations but require users to retrieve and enter daily ET 0 values. Since separate spreadsheet files maybe needed for each crop, these programs may be difficult to implement in large growing operations that manage many fields.…”
Section: Overview Of Sofware Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant water uptake was assumed to be a descending extraction pattern that depends on irrigation frequency such that greater uptake is at the top quarter of the root zone [18,[41][42][43]. Plant growth and root development parameters are summarized in Table A2 and Equation (B8) [38,[44][45][46][47] and we assumed that strawberries were planted on 1.3 m wide raised beds as is common in the region. The model was calibrated for soil salinity generation due to dissolution and a dissolution rate is used to account for these processes.…”
Section: Root Zone Salinity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%