2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumptive water use and crop coefficients for warm-season turfgrass species in the Southeastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
37
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
37
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely due to the nearly constant values of K e resulting from the abundant and frequent rains that kept the soil evaporation layer wet most of time for all three cutting treatments. The standard K c values reported in Table 8 for this study with Tifton 85 bermudagrass are larger than those reported by Wherley et al [23] for bermudagrass and by Graham et al [48] for ryegrass, and slightly larger than those reported by Neal et al [24] for ryegrass. These authors also adopted a single averaged K c .…”
Section: Crop Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is likely due to the nearly constant values of K e resulting from the abundant and frequent rains that kept the soil evaporation layer wet most of time for all three cutting treatments. The standard K c values reported in Table 8 for this study with Tifton 85 bermudagrass are larger than those reported by Wherley et al [23] for bermudagrass and by Graham et al [48] for ryegrass, and slightly larger than those reported by Neal et al [24] for ryegrass. These authors also adopted a single averaged K c .…”
Section: Crop Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…A few authors directly compared ET obtained with eddy covariance, BREB, or a soil water balance with ET o but not searching for a K c value [20], or even assumed equality between grass ET and ET o [21]. Other authors just computed daily K c act values (often using different designations for that parameter) but did not search for a K c curve that would describe their seasonal variation [22,23], or just identified a mean seasonal K c act [24]. The lack of search for a K c curve led some authors to consider the K c -ET o approach as non-useful [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the growing season, ET rates of most turfgrass range from 3 to 8 mm d −1 and can be as high as 12 mm d −1 (Beard, 1973). The ET rates of warm‐season grasses fluctuate over time and have been reported to range from 0.5 mm d −1 during winter to 5.0 mm d −1 during late spring and early summer in a lysimeter study conducted in Florida (Wherley et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comprehensive study evaluating various turfgrass K c values, Carrow (1995) (using the FAO modified Penman equation) determined that the K c for Tifway bermudagrass varied from 0.53 to 0.97 throughout the season in the southeastern United States. Wherley et al (2015) (using the ASCE‐EWRI Standardized Method) reported that K c of Tifway bermudagrass, ‘Empire’ zoysiagrass ( Zoysia japonica Steud. ), and ‘Floratam’ St. Augustinegrass [ Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze] did not differ on 24 of 30 measurement periods over 3 yr in Florida.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%