2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijft.2022.100152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact angle of the ferronanofluid and influence of the magnetic field on the drying droplet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Comparison of the present model with the experimental results of Banerjee and Sen at Bo M = 57.33, κ = 10.04, χ 0 = 0.5, and Ca = 0.0021. (b) Validating the present analytical model with Mulka et al’s experimental findings at Bo M ranging from 0 to 7.253 (corresponding to the H = 16,000 A/m), κ ranging from 0 to 1.087, χ 0 = 0.669, and Ca = 0.0022.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) Comparison of the present model with the experimental results of Banerjee and Sen at Bo M = 57.33, κ = 10.04, χ 0 = 0.5, and Ca = 0.0021. (b) Validating the present analytical model with Mulka et al’s experimental findings at Bo M ranging from 0 to 7.253 (corresponding to the H = 16,000 A/m), κ ranging from 0 to 1.087, χ 0 = 0.669, and Ca = 0.0022.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The comparison of the dynamic shape modulations shows sound agreement. Mulka et al 22 conducted a series of experiments to demonstrate the impact of external magnetic fields on the contact angle difference (Δθ = θ M − θ 0 ) of a ferrofluid droplet (MSG-W10, FerroTec, USA) onto copper (EN CW008A, 99.99 wt % Cu) and aluminum (EN 6082/3.2315) surfaces, separately. Here, a rise in the contact angle was noticed when the field intensity was increased and the magnet was positioned sideways to the droplet as opposed to being positioned vertically above it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%