2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact-Free Palm-Vein Recognition Based on Local Invariant Features

Abstract: Contact-free palm-vein recognition is one of the most challenging and promising areas in hand biometrics. In view of the existing problems in contact-free palm-vein imaging, including projection transformation, uneven illumination and difficulty in extracting exact ROIs, this paper presents a novel recognition approach for contact-free palm-vein recognition that performs feature extraction and matching on all vein textures distributed over the palm surface, including finger veins and palm veins, to minimize th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two kinds of representative hand-crafted feature extraction algorithms are used as reference: The one is the local invariant feature model [4] including SIFT, SURF, ASIFT, Root-SIFT, and it has the advantages of being invariant to rotation, translation, scale uncertainty and even nonuniform illumination, which makes it the best one among all hand-crafted algorithms (Note that all the models adopt DHE for contrast enhancement followed by direct extraction of keypoints and matching without the proposed mismatching removal). The other one is the LBP and its variants including LDP, LTP, and LLBP, and such model is widely applied for vein based identification application for its efficiency, and it also provides competitive recognition results.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two kinds of representative hand-crafted feature extraction algorithms are used as reference: The one is the local invariant feature model [4] including SIFT, SURF, ASIFT, Root-SIFT, and it has the advantages of being invariant to rotation, translation, scale uncertainty and even nonuniform illumination, which makes it the best one among all hand-crafted algorithms (Note that all the models adopt DHE for contrast enhancement followed by direct extraction of keypoints and matching without the proposed mismatching removal). The other one is the LBP and its variants including LDP, LTP, and LLBP, and such model is widely applied for vein based identification application for its efficiency, and it also provides competitive recognition results.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem, nearly all SIFT/SURF based vein recognition system (as illustrated in Fig. 1 sults reported [4]. However, conclusions in [2], which bring evidence that the number of SIFT keypoints resulted by gradient based detectors increases greatly with CE, while on the other hand the matching result of extracted invariant descriptors is negatively influenced in terms of Precision Recall (PR) and Equal Error Rate (EER), motivate us to rethink and investigate the overall effect of CE on SIFT based vein recognition system, and also design the scale and contrast invariant feature matching (SCIFM) strategy to construct more robust vein recognition system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its application can be found also in the works by [4,5]. Apart from feature extraction the Gaussian function was applied to improve the image contrast as shown in [6] and [7]. The blood vessel pattern of the hand is extended enough to allow the use of different methods for extracting and coding features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, nearly all the related research focuses on vein feature extraction methods design, which serves as the key link for vein recognition task. Among all the reported feature extraction models, we intend to summarize them into four groups [2]: global topological analysis (GTA), global quantification analysis (GQA), local geometric analysis (LGA) and local invariant feature (LIF). Driven by the fact that the subject-specified hand-vein information could be well represented by the four models, is that possible to obtain effective gender-specified representation so that accurate gender classification result would be generated with similar methods?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%