2012
DOI: 10.1177/1350650112463307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact modelling of human skin: What value to use for the modulus of elasticity?

Abstract: In modelling and understanding the contact and friction behaviour of human skin, the elastic modulus of the skin is an important input parameter. For the development of design rules for the engineering of surfaces in contact with the skin an expression that describes the relation between the elastic modulus of the skin and the size of the contact is essential. Although an exact description of the mechanical behaviour of the skin requires an anisotropic, nonlinear, viscoelastic model, in this study it was found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, based on a fully elastic approximation combined with a GreenwoodWilliamson-like statistical approach, Masen [50] estimated h to range between −0.66 and −1. However, this latter estimate is an over-simplification because the mechanical properties of skin vary with the size of the contact [39], and a deterministic approach to account for the effects of surface roughness seems more appropriate. For surfaces with a roughness Rq in the order of micrometres and more, the adhesive model gives rather low coefficients of friction, and such low values are not obtained in experiments.…”
Section: Changing Friction By Surface Texturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, based on a fully elastic approximation combined with a GreenwoodWilliamson-like statistical approach, Masen [50] estimated h to range between −0.66 and −1. However, this latter estimate is an over-simplification because the mechanical properties of skin vary with the size of the contact [39], and a deterministic approach to account for the effects of surface roughness seems more appropriate. For surfaces with a roughness Rq in the order of micrometres and more, the adhesive model gives rather low coefficients of friction, and such low values are not obtained in experiments.…”
Section: Changing Friction By Surface Texturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skin of the fingers and palm is known to have complex, nonlinear mechanics (61)(62)(63), with properties that vary widely over different spatial and temporal scales (64,65). Modeling the precise skin deformation resulting from a given stimulus requires advanced models (66,67), measurements of individual skin properties (68), many parameters, and considerable computing power.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPa depending on the hydration state [43]. On this basis, a hypothesis for the much higher average CoF of the synthetic skin compared to human skin is that the real area of contact at the interface is greater due to a lower effective elastic modulus than the SC on human skin.…”
Section: Effect Of Dry or Moist Skin Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthetic skin does not have the complexity of human skin, for which the SC has a thickness in the range 10 to 40 ”m and the viable epidermis, dermis and hypodermis layers are of varying thicknesses and have different mechanical properties [43]. It is also unlikely to have an organic surface layer equivalent to that on human skin.…”
Section: Effect Of Dry or Moist Skin Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%