2016
DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Urticaria to Nickel: A Series of 11 Patients Who Were Prick Test Positive and Patch Test Negative to Nickel Sulfate 2.5% and 5.0%

Abstract: Our series suggests that CU to nickel may be far more common than anticipated and should be evaluated with prick testing when patients' history suggests nickel allergy and yet they are patch test negative.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, since patch testing relies on a type IV hypersensitivity reaction, it may not capture all types of nickel allergy. A case series identified 11 patients who tested negative with the patch test but positive with the prick test 29. This limitation of the patch test may explain discrepancies between test results and symptoms of hypersensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since patch testing relies on a type IV hypersensitivity reaction, it may not capture all types of nickel allergy. A case series identified 11 patients who tested negative with the patch test but positive with the prick test 29. This limitation of the patch test may explain discrepancies between test results and symptoms of hypersensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our center also performs prick testing due to concern for underrecognized metal contact urticaria, and immunoglobulin E-mediated type-1 hypersensitivity reaction. 12,17 Surgical removal was performed in nearly all patients through a minimally invasive right anterior thoracotomy on the beating heart with peripheral cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. After removal of the device, residual septal defects were either directly repaired or patched closed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, these urticarial reactions often present as chronic cutaneous urticaria, which may be driven by metal exposures in a device or even in foods. Systemic nickel exposures are known to cause systemic urticarial (type I, immediate type) reactions (20). Chronic urticaria may be caused and perpetuated by nickel exposure, either internally through the placement of a device or through dietary exposures (20,21).…”
Section: Epidemiology and Mechanism Of Allergic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic nickel exposures are known to cause systemic urticarial (type I, immediate type) reactions (20). Chronic urticaria may be caused and perpetuated by nickel exposure, either internally through the placement of a device or through dietary exposures (20,21). A nickel restricted diet usually is helpful in many cases.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Mechanism Of Allergic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%