Contemplative Practices Behavior Is Positively Associated with Well-Being in Three Global Multi-Regional Stanford WELL for Life Cohorts

Abstract

Positive associations between well-being and a single contemplative practice (e.g., mindfulness meditation) are well documented, yet prior work may have underestimated the strength of the association by omitting consideration of multiple and/or alternative contemplative practices. Moreover, little is known about how contemplative practice behavior (CPB) impacts different dimensions of well-being. This study investigates the relationship of CPB, consisting of four discrete practices (embodied somatic-observing, non-reactive mindfulness, self-compassion, and compassion for others), with multiple dimensions of well-being. As with other canonical lifestyle behaviors, multiple contemplative practices can be integrated into one’s daily routine. Thus, it is critical to holistically consider these behaviors, extending them beyond a simple uni-dimensional measure (e.g., daily mindfulness meditation practice). We developed an integrative measure of four types of contemplative practice and found it to be significantly associated with a multi-dimensional measure of well-being. Importantly, our findings were from three large global multi-regional cohorts and compared against better-understood lifestyle behaviors (physical activity). Data were drawn from California/San Francisco Bay Area, (n = 6,442), Hangzhou City (n = 10,268), and New Taipei City (n = 3,033). In all three cohorts, we found statistically significant (p < 0.05) positive associations between CPB and well-being, both overall and with all of the constituent domains of well-being, comparable to or stronger than the relationship with physical activity across most well-being outcomes. These findings provide robust and cross-cultural evidence for a positive association between CPB and well-being, illuminate dimensions of well-being that could be most influenced by CPB, and suggest CPB may be useful to include as part of fundamental lifestyle recommendations for health and well-being.

Literature Review the Effect of Mindfulness Interventions on Blood Pressure and Stress in Hypertension Patients

“…The study examined the characteristics of different research designs used in the Randomized Control Trial (RCT). It included 1 articles that used a cluster randomized design (Rich et al, 2022); 4 articles that used quasi-experimental designs (Sabetfar et al, 2021; Samsualam, 2022; Shahbazi et al, 2022; Torné-Ruiz et al, 2023); and 3 articles that used cross-sectional designs (Moceri & Cox, 2019b; Noventi et al, 2022; Sen Gökçeimam et al, 2022). There is a single publication featuring a prospective clinical trial design authored by Trancoso Lopes et al (Trancoso Lopes et al, 2022).…”

Diet Quality and Resilience through Adulthood: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WELL for Life Study

“…Since it was created within the Stanford Prevention Research Center (SPRC) in 2017, investigators have been using WELL to generate comprehensive scientific data to help define, understand, and improve well-being among people from diverse backgrounds [ 43 ]. The WELL study design, protocol, informed consent measures, recruitment, and survey measures have been published elsewhere [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Briefly, the WELL Survey consists of 76 items, spanning 10 domains of well-being.…”

Sarcoidosis and frailty: recognizing factors that foster holistic resilience

“…We describe a framework containing four overarching domains that encapsulate holistic well-being [3,6 ▪▪ ,9 ▪▪ ,11,12,32,33] and focuses on the assessment and fortification of resilience in sarcoidosis and other multiorgan conditions. Figure 1 depicts an open-ended nonprescriptive confluence intended to invigorate opportunities for risk recognition, health education, personalization, and possibility centered on patients’ priorities and preferences.…”